TITLE

The Impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapon Ban on Gun Violence Outcomes: An Assessment of Multiple Outcome Measures and Some Lessons for Policy Evaluation

AUTHOR(S)

Koper, Christopher S.; Roth, Jeffrey A.

PUB. DATE

March 2001

SOURCE

Journal of Quantitative Criminology;Mar2001, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p33

SOURCE TYPE

Academic Journal

DOC. TYPE

Article

ABSTRACT

The Federal Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 bans a group of military-style semiautomatic firearms (i.e., assault weapons) and ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. Ban advocates argue that these weapons are particularly dangerous because they facilitate the rapid firing of high numbers of shots. Though the banned guns and magazines were used in only a modest fraction of gun crimes before the law, it was hypothesized that a decrease in their use might reduce gunshot victimizations, particularly those involving multiple wounds and/or victims. In response to a Congressional mandate for an impact assessment of the law, this study utilized national and local data sources and a variety of analytical techniques to examine the ban's short-term impact on gun violence. The ban may have contributed to a reduction in gun homicides, but a statistical power analysis of our model indicated that any likely impact from the ban will be very difficult to detect statistically for several more years. We found no evidence of reductions in multiple-victim gun homicides or multiple-gunshot wound victimizations. The findings should be treated cautiously due to the methodological difficulties of making a short-term assessment of the ban and because the ban's long-term effects could differ from the short-term impacts revealed by this study.

ACCESSION #

11303509

Tags: ASSAULT weapons -- Law & legislation;  GUN control;  CRIMINAL justice administration -- United States;  CRIMINAL law;  LAW enforcement;  VIOLENT crimes;  STATISTICAL hypothesis testing

 

Related Articles

• A Priori Assertions Versus Empirical Inquiry: A Reply to Kleck. Koper, Christopher S.; Roth, Jeffrey A. // Journal of Quantitative Criminology;Mar2001, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p81 

  Presents the authors' clarification in response to a commentary by Gary Kleck on their article, contained in this issue of the "Journal of Quantitative Criminology," which analyzes how the 1994 federal ban on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines (AW-LCM ban) affected 1995 homicide rates...

• Criminal Record. Kopel, David // National Review;9/2/1996, Vol. 48 Issue 16, p43 

  The article comments on the move by U.S. President Bill Clinton to give more power to federally controlled law-enforcement. It contends that the ban on assault weapons has had political ramifications as evidenced by the 20 Democratic legislators who lost their congressional seats. It criticizes...

• Jonesboro and gun control. Williams, Armstrong // New York Amsterdam News;05/28/98, Vol. 89 Issue 22, p8 

  Opinion. Comments on United States President Bill Clinton's announcement relating to the banning of the importation of assault weapons. Discussion on strategies to reduce violent crimes; Indication that New York Senator Patrick Moynihan called for the banning of special types of ammunition;...

• Impossible Policy Evaluations and Impossible Conclusions: A Comment on Koper and Roth. Kleck, Gary // Journal of Quantitative Criminology;Mar2001, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p75 

  Presents the author's comments on an article by Christopher S. Koper and Jeffrey A. Roth which evaluates the 1994 federal assault weapon ban in the U.S., contained in this issue of the "Journal of Quantitative Criminology." Assessment of the impact of the ban on gun violence outcomes; Criticism...

• The Cognitive Gap between the Police and the Policed. Rafky, David M. // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);1977, Vol. 1 Issue 1, p63 

  No abstract available.

• ABOLITION AND REINSTATEMENT OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT DURING THE PROGRESSIVE ERA AND EARLY 20TH CENTURY. Galliher, John F.; Ray, Gregory; Cook, Brent // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1992, Vol. 83 Issue 3, p538 

  Ten American states abolished the death penalty between 1897 and 1917, but by the end of the 1930s, eight of these states had reinstated capital punishment. Not surprisingly, many of these abolitionist states were relatively homogeneous. Information ranging from individual motivations and...

• Lethal weapon 2. Fedarko, Kevin; Barrett, Laurence I. // Time;5/16/1994, Vol. 143 Issue 20, p40 

  Recounts the House of Representatives vote of 216 to 214 that bans 19 kinds of assault weapons. Why the win was a surprise; The bill's limited scope; Similarity to a Senate passed measure; Comparisons of assault weapons and automatic weapons; Their features; Examples; How the vote broke down;...

• You can help swing the vote on gun control.  // Glamour;Apr95, Vol. 93 Issue 4, p112 

  Editorial. Calls on women to support the fight against the enactment of legislation to repeal the assault-weapons ban in the United States. Election of legislators in 1994 who are in favor of the National Rifle Association's move for a repeal of the ban; Tactics used by the pro-gun movement;...

• Turning Hope-and-Change Talk Into Clemency Action for Nonviolent Drug Offenders. Berman, Douglas A. // New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement;Winter2010, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p59 

  The article focuses on the statements from U.S. President Barack Obama regarding the need to change the country's criminal justice systems, mainly with respect to nonviolent drug offenders. It states that Obama's administration has taken initiatives to bring the themes of change and hope to...

Read the Article