Volkswagen recall plan nixed

Investor's Business Daily
January 2016
Investors Business Daily;1/13/2016, pA02
The article reports that the recall plan of automaker Volkswagen AG for a number of diesel-engine automobiles with software that provided deceptive data on emission test has been rejected by California Air Resources Board.


Related Articles

  • Business trucks deserve a bigger break in Calif.  // Automotive News;11/16/1998, Vol. 73 Issue 5793, p12 

    Calls for the fine-tuning of the California Air Resources Board's ruling that light trucks must meet the same emissions standards as cars. Phase-in of the ruling as scheduled for 2004; Exemption of a percentage of a manufacturer's light-duty sales; State's plan to regulate diesel engines the...

  • CARB eases mandate--not enough for OEMs. Priddle, Alisa // Ward's Auto World;Jan2001, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p14 

    Focuses on the move taken by the California Air Resources Board in its zero-emissions vehicle mandate for 2003. Terms under the revised rules; Stance of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

  • California may owe truckers for fuel-related repairs.  // Overdrive;Nov94, Vol. 34 Issue 11, p18 

    Anticipates the signing of a bill that orders the California Air Resources Board to put a reimbursement program into place by the end of November 1994. Benefits to truckers whose engines were damaged by the change to low-sulfur, low-aromatic diesel fuel; Deadline for submission of claims.

  • CARB offers filter credit.  // Overdrive;May2011, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p75 

    The article offers information on the early action compliance credit for trucking fleets offered by California Air Resources Board.

  • California air rules foster MTBE demand. Cornitius, Tim // Chemical Week;7/17/1996, Vol. 158 Issue 27, p33 

    Reports on the completion on June 1, 1996 of the phase-in of new California Air Resources Board regulations mandating year-round oxygenates use in motor gasoline. Resurgence of the North American market for methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE); Increase in the demand for MTBE.

  • Big 3 see delay in '98 Calif. EV edict. Rechtin, Mark // Automotive News;11/22/1993, Vol. 67 Issue 5527, p1 

    Reports on General Motors Corp., Chrysler Corp. and Ford Motor Co.'s expectation that the California Air Resources Board will modify or delay its 1998 electric-vehicle mandate. Impact of Jananne Sharpless' resignation as chairman of the Board; Warning by state officials against the automakers'...

  • California's big scam. Crain, Keith E.; Brown, Peter // Automotive News;5/30/1994, Vol. 68 Issue 5554, p12 

    Opinion. Comments on California Air Resources Board's ruling that automakers must sell electric cars if they want to do business in the state. Motive behind the ruling.

  • CARB sets limits on VOCs in coatings, aerosol paint.  // Paint & Coatings Industry;Aug95, Vol. 11 Issue 8, p84 

    Reports that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has adopted a regulation limiting the volatile organic compound (VOC) content of seven categories of general coatings and 29 specialty categories of aerosol paint sold in the state. Effectivity of the regulation; Other provisions of the...

  • Carmakers rip CARB hybrid straw man. Rechtin, Mark // Automotive News;8/14/1995, Vol. 69 Issue 5618, p8 

    Reports on the Californian automobile industry and trade's opposition to the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) proposal to alter the 1998 mandate for zero emission vehicles. Paradox with the proposal; Account of Mitsubishi's support for the proposal; Claims raised by environmentalists...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics