TITLE

ELECTION LAW--INTRODUCTION

AUTHOR(S)
Levinson, Jessica A.
PUB. DATE
April 2015
SOURCE
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p587
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses several reports published within issue on topics including campaign finance law in the U.S.; the Federal Election Campaign Act; and definition of corruption.
ACCESSION #
112206829

 

Related Articles

  • Letters to the Editor. MANDLE, JAY R. // Foreign Affairs;Sep/Oct2013, Vol. 92 Issue 5, p181 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article entitled "In Defense of Citizens United" by Glenn Hubbard and Tim Kane in the July/August 2013 issue which discusses the United States 1971 Federal Election Campaign Act.

  • When a Contribution Becomes a Crime. Uram, Seth D. // Young Lawyer;Oct2008, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1 

    A summary is presented of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), which regulates the financing of federal elections in the U.S.

  • Campaign Spending, Diminishing Marginal Returns, and Campaign Finance Restrictions in Judicial Elections. Bonneau, Chris W.; Cann, Damon M. // Journal of Politics;Oct2011, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p1267 

    For years, scholars of elections have argued about whether campaign finance limitations adversely affect electoral competition. In this article, we examine how the institutional campaign finance restrictions differentially affect the performance of incumbents and challengers. Using elections for...

  • MCCUTCHEON V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION AND THE SUPREME COURT'S NARROWED DEFINITION OF CORRUPTION. Noe, Mikala // Maine Law Review;2014, Vol. 67 Issue 1, p163 

    The article offers information on the judicial decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, in which the Court examined the issues related to corruption in election campaign financing under the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA). It...

  • DARK MONEY RISES: FEDERAL AND STATE ATTEMPTS TO REIN IN UNDISCLOSED CAMPAIGN-RELATED SPENDING. Eagan, Kristy // Fordham Urban Law Journal;Dec2012, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p801 

    The article focuses on the attempts of the U.S. federal and state government regarding concerns related to competing interests of free speech rights and campaign financial disclosures. It evaluates federal disclosure requirements and their loopholes regarding the interpretation of the U.S....

  • Corruption Temptation. Charles, Guy-Uriel E. // California Law Review;Feb2014, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p25 

    In response to Professor Lawrence Lessig's Jorde Lecture, I suggest that corruption is not the proper conceptual vehicle for thinking about the problems that Professor Lessig wants us to think about. I argue that Professor Lessig's real concern is that, for the vast majority of citizens, wealth...

  • JUDGE J. SKELLY WRIGHT: POLITICS, MONEY, AND EQUALITY. Lee, Carol F. // Loyola Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p93 

    An essay is presented on Judge J. Skelly Wright's opinion towards campaign funds in politics, racial inequality and economic inequality. Topics discussed include his decisions in cases related to corruptions in government, approval of the campaign finance legislation by the United States'...

  • THE CHANGING STANDARDS OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATION: THE REAL IMPACT OF MCCUTCHEON V. FEC. Dunn, Hannah // Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review;Winter2014, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p573 

    The article discusses various changes to campaign finance regulations in America as of 2014, and it mentions the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) to strike down aggregate limits on political campaign contributions set forth in Title 2,...

  • FORTY YEARS AFTER WATERGATE. Karlan, Pamela S. // Boston Review;Jul/Aug2012, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p12 

    The article analyzes U.S. campaign finance law in light of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the 1976 case Buckley v. Valeo, which held that campaign contributions could be limited, while self-funding of campaigns could not. This decision is said to be related to 1974 amendments to the U.S....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics