TITLE

Summary of Arguments on Protection vs Free Trade

PUB. DATE
March 1932
SOURCE
Congressional Digest;Mar1932, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p87
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
It is claimed that proponents of the free trade tend to a static view of the society. Free trade means that exchange between countries shall take place without measures that cause the domestic production of articles which in the absence of restriction would be imported. It does not mean that there shall be no duties and no restrictions. The imposition of revenue duties on articles that would not be made at home even after these duties have been imposed is not inconsistent with the principle of free trade.
ACCESSION #
11195782

 

Related Articles

  • EU banana trade tariff quota lowered.  // Food & Drink Technology;Dec2005/Jan2006, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p12 

    The article reports that the European Union (EU) has been pressurized to lower its protection of the Caribbean banana industry. The EU ministers have decided to support an import tariff of 176 per tonne from January 1, 2005 for all World Trade Organization (WTO) member countries. They have...

  • Protection Racket.  // New Republic;4/25/2005, Vol. 232 Issue 15, p7 

    Presents an editorial regarding United States President George W. Bush's use of protectionism for short-term political gain. Reference to a Commerce Department report showing a February 2005 trade deficit of $61 billion; Surge of Chinese textile and clothing imports due to the expiration of the...

  • The Optimum Quota and Retaliation. Tower, Edward // Review of Economic Studies;Oct75, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p623 

    It is well known that a country can generally raise its welfare above that which prevails under free trade by imposing a tariff on imports. Moreover, under competitive conditions, it is well known that for every tariff there is an" equivalent quota" on imports or exports which will have...

  • The fight goes on. Tirschwell, Peter // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);9/01/2003, Vol. 4 Issue 35, p6 

    Deals with the issues regarding the elimination of international trade quotas by the World Trade Organization by January 1, 2005. Role of the quota system in the prevalence of smuggling; Misconceptions surrounding the elimination of quotas; Explanation for the complexity in importing textiles...

  • PARTISANSHIP TRUMPS PROTECTIONISM. Stokes, Bruce // National Journal;1/24/2004, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p250 

    Deals with the growing partisanship in U.S. politics and its threat to international trade deals. Factors that could complicate prospects for the passage of the Central American Free Trade Agreement; Difficulty of passing trade legislation; Implication of the demise of bipartisanship for trade...

  • Voluntary Export Restraints. Mason, Mike // Globalization & Development: A Glossary;2005, p141 

    An encyclopedia entry on "Voluntary Export Restraints" is presented. It refers to the agreement between the U.S. and other states to restrict imports into the U.S. The U.S. Trade Act of 1974 authorized the U.S. to take punitive action against countries that were found guilty of unfair trading.

  • To my mind. Naude, Colleen // Finweek;9/14/2006, p6 

    The article reflects on the plan of the South African government to introduce protectionism to try to save its waning textiles industry. It argues that protectionism is not the answer to the country's trade dilemma with China. It suggests that rather than setting import quotas, it would make...

  • Shifts, No Threats.  // Indian Textile Journal;Feb2005, Vol. 115 Issue 5, p7 

    This article comments on the impact of the removal of the 30-year-old quota system on the textile industry at the dawn of 2005. The unleashing of free-market forces has begun to shake the foundation of the massive textile industry worldwide. Some Central American nations like El Salvador and...

  • The New Protectionism. Adams, Walter // Challenge (05775132);May/Jun73, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p6 

    To compete in world trade, we need higher productivity, not more protection. The lessons of history, said U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935, show conclusively that continued dependence on relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics