TITLE

Results of Long-Term Follow-Up for Transanal Excision for Rectal Cancer

AUTHOR(S)
Gonzalez, Quintin H.; Heslin, Martin J.; Shore, Gregg; Vickers, Selwyn M.; Urist, Marshall M.; Bland, Kirby I.
PUB. DATE
August 2003
SOURCE
American Surgeon;Aug2003, Vol. 69 Issue 8, p675
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection are the surgical techniques used most frequently in the treatment of rectal cancer. It is our hypothesis that selected patients with early T stage, well or moderate grade of differentiation, and small tumor size are good candidates for transanal excision in terms of minimal morbidity, low recurrence rate, and sphincter preservation. From January 1993 until August 2001 30 patients underwent transanal excision; three patients were excluded because they had histology other than adenocarcinoma. Factors analyzed included those related to the patient [age (years), gender, race, body mass index, and anal tone], tumor [size (cm), distance from the anal verge (cm), differentiation, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage], and additional treatment. Median follow-up of the group was 40.7 months (range 0.6-99) and the primary end points were local and distant recurrence. Data are presented as mean (range). The median age of the group was 58.9 years (range 27-94); 52 per cent were female and 48 per cent were male. The mean body mass index was 25.9 (range 22.7-36.7). Preoperatively 81, 11, and 4 per cent of the patients had stage I, II, and III/IV cancer, respectively. Preoperative size of the tumor was 2.0 cm (1-3 cm), and distance from the anal verge was 5.0 cm (3-15 cm). Blood loss was 50 cm³ (5-200 cm³), and there were no operative complications. Tumor differentiation levels were well (37%) and moderate (63%). All patients had negative margins. Additional treatment consisted of radiation therapy in seven patients (six postoperative and one preoperative). Chemotherapy was given to seven patients (six postoperative and one preoperative). The local...
ACCESSION #
11073678

 

Related Articles

  • Surgery for rectal cancer.  // Caribbean Health;Dec2000, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p23 

    The article offers information on the technique of total mesorectal excision (TIME) in the treatment of rectal cancer. The technique relies on sharp dissection under direct vision with the removal of an intact mesorectal envelope with margins free of tumor. It has been taught since 1994 to all...

  • Bladder-Sparing Extended Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Involving the Prostate and Seminal Vesicles. Norio Saito; Takanori Suzuki; Masanori Sugito; Masaaki Ito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Toshiyuki Tanaka; Masahito Kotaka; Hirokazu Karaki; Takaya Kobatake; Yoshiyuki Tsunoda; Akio Shiomi; Masaaki Yano; Nozomi Minagawa; Yuji Nishizawa // Surgery Today;Oct2007, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p845 

    Abstract Purpose  Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) is the standard procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate and seminal vesicles. We evaluated the feasibility of bladder-sparing surgery as an alternative to TPE. Methods  Eleven patients with advanced...

  • Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer — electronic supplementary: op-video. Fürst, Alois; Schwandner, Oliver; Heiligensetzer, Arthur; Iesalnieks, Igors; Agha, Ayman // Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery;Feb2010, Vol. 395 Issue 2, p181 

    Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has been proved in various studies. The minimal invasive procedure is feasible and safe which was demonstrated in many studies. However, the results of prospective, randomized studies providing valuable evidence are still not...

  • MRI staging of low rectal cancer. Shihab, Oliver C.; Moran, Brendan J.; Heald, Richard J.; Quirke, Philip; Brown, Gina // European Radiology;Mar2009, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p643 

    Low rectal tumours, especially those treated by abdominoperineal excision (APE), have a high rate of margin involvement when compared with tumours elsewhere in the rectum. Correct surgical management to minimise this rate of margin involvement is reliant on highly accurate imaging, which can be...

  • Laparoscopic low vs. high anterior resection for rectal cancer. Hanisch, E.; Ziogas, D. // Surgical Endoscopy;Sep2010, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p2359 

    The article reports on a study comparing short-term results between two groups of patients, one with upper rectal cancer located between 75 and 150 mm from the anal verge and another one with lower rectal cancer located within 75 mm from the anal verge. The study says that intraoperative blood...

  • The 'modified triple staple' technique: A variant stapling technique for anastomosis after low anterior resection. Balaji, N. S.; Macklin, C. P.; Fawole, S.; Aster, A. S.; Rao, V. S. R.; Moore, P. J.; Ahmad, S. M. // Surgeon (Edinburgh University Press);Aug2007, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p199 

    Introduction: Stapled techniques of coloanal anastomosis in anterior resection have gained widespread acceptance over hand anastomosis. We believe a modification of the 'triple staple technique' has ergonomic advantages over existing stapling methods and present our technique and experience...

  • Outcome of transvaginal excision of large rectal adenomas: invited comment. Hölscher, A. H. // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Jul2005, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p338 

    Comments on a case report on patients with sessile adenomas of the rectum that were treated during a 6-year period by transvaginal excision. Complications from transvaginal excision; Advantages of the transanal excision of rectal adenomas over transvaginal excision.

  • Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach. Keller, Deborah; Khorgami, Zhamak; Swendseid, Brian; Champagne, Bradley; Reynolds, Harry; Stein, Sharon; Delaney, Conor // Surgical Endoscopy;Jun2014, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1940 

    Background and objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes for rectal cancer resection by operative approach. Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic (LAP) and LAP converted to open (OPEN) rectal cancer resections have excellent patient and oncologic outcomes. Methods: Review of a...

  • Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Dulucq, J.-L.; Wintringer, P.; Stabilini, C.; Mahajna, A. // Surgical Endoscopy;Nov2005, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p1468 

    Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the surgical gold standard treatment for middle and low third rectal carcinoma. Laparoscopy has gradually become accepted for the treatment of colorectal malignancy after a long period of questions regarding its safety. The purposes of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics