TITLE

Journalists' Privilege

AUTHOR(S)
Kinsley, Michael
PUB. DATE
May 1979
SOURCE
New Republic;5/12/79, Vol. 180 Issue 19, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Explains that Jack Landau, head of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, poses the biggest threat to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Supreme Court decision reaffirming the state of the libel laws as they have existed for the past 15 years; Indication of journalists' contempt for the freedom of speech rights of non-journalists; Immunity from libel laws of statements about public figures unless they were made with reckless disregard for the truth; Argument that the First Amendment protects the editorial process of the press from public scrutiny.
ACCESSION #
11068981

 

Related Articles

  • THE RIGHT TO SPEAK FROM TIMES TO TIME: FIRST AMENDMENT THEORY APPLIED TO LIBEL AND MISAPPLIED TO PRIVACY. Nimmer, Melville B. // California Law Review;Aug68 part 1, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p935 

    Examines the first amendment guarantee of free speech in the constitution of the United States. Need to consider the time, place and manner; Objections to the use of ad hoc balancing in resolving free speech issues; U.S. Supreme Court decision in 'New York Times Company v. Sullivan';...

  • Is "Actual Malice" Rule A Special Privilege for the Press? Stonecipher, Harry W. // Newspaper Research Journal;Apr1981, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p35 

    The article focuses on the free press clause of the First Amendment, as a structural provision of the U.S. Constitution. It affords the institutional press protection which goes beyond the scope of the speech clause guarantee. Indeed, such freedom of press claims through the years have generally...

  • Six lean years. Boylan, James // Columbia Journalism Review;Summer1963, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p51 

    This article comments on the judgment in the libel case filed by John Henry Faulk against Aware Inc. It is a paradox of current reading habits that an article offered to 7,000,000 readers can be overlooked by journalists. This writer's inquiries indicate that this is what has happened to The...

  • Burying the libel hatchet. Cranberg, Gilbert // Columbia Journalism Review;Jan/Feb88, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p49 

    Outlines strategies practitioners of journalism to keep libel disputes out of court. Recommendation to take steps in arbitration such as those in the Iowa Libel Dispute Resolution Program; Application of imaginatively structured settlements that assuage the plaintiff without sacrificing...

  • FREE SPEECH, REPUTATION, AND THE CANADIAN BALANCE. Brouillet, Eug�nie // New York Law School Law Review;2005/2006, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p33 

    This article focuses on the Canadian approach to reputation and speech in relation to defamation law. The author notes that Canadian common law has tended to favor the protection of reputation at the expense of free speech, and that the American and Quebec laws of defamation have adopted a...

  • Drunken doctors, protesting politicians and the reporter's duty to verify facts: Selistö v Finland (ECHR, App. no. 56767/00). Caddell, Richard // Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunicati;2005, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p25 

    The article discusses the decision made by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on the Selistö versus Finland and its impact on the duties and responsibilities aspect of press freedom in Great Britain. The decision is considered as one of the most significant judgments that have been...

  • Can Libel Tourism Be Stopped? McCarthy, Andrew C. // Commentary;Sep2008, Vol. 126 Issue 2, p32 

    The article discusses libel tourism. The Libel Tourism Protection Act of New York is mentioned. Also discussed in the article is Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz, a Saudi banker with Irish citizenship who has been accused of having terrorist ties. The silencing of writers, editors, and publishers is...

  • First Amendment lives! Shields, Todd // Editor & Publisher;05/28/2001, Vol. 134 Issue 22, p8 

    Reports the amendment on free speech handed down by the Supreme Court in the United States. Publication of the possibly stolen material by journalists; Details on the ruling of justices; Emphasis on the scope of the ruling by separate opinions of the two justices.

  • At Home. Evans, M. Stanton // National Review Bulletin;11/30/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 48, pB182 

    This article argues that the legal crusade being waged by businessman Ralph Nader as of November 30, 1979 could result in a curtailment of the U.S. First Amendment right of freedom of the press. Specifically, the article focuses on a libel lawsuit filed by Nader against syndicated columnist...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics