TITLE

Micropercutaneous nephrolithotripsy: initial experience

AUTHOR(S)
Ölçücüoğlu, Erkan; Kasap, Yusuf; Ölçücüoğlu, Esin; Şirin, Mehmet Emin; Gazel, Eymen; Taştemur, Sedat; Odabas, Öner
PUB. DATE
July 2015
SOURCE
Videosurgery & Other Miniinvasive Techniques / Wideochirurgia i;2015, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p368
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Introduction: For small renal calculi (< 2 cm) the currently available treatment options include extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and standard/mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). A new method, microperc, has therefore been developed, in which a smaller tract size and smaller instruments were used. Aim: To present our clinical experiences with micropercutaneous nephrolithotripsy (microperc) in the treatment of small renal calculi. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with small renal calculi who underwent microperc between February and June 2013. A 4.8 Fr 'all-seeing needle' was used to achieve percutaneous renal access with the C-arm fluoroscopy guidance in the prone position. Holmium: YAG laser 272 μm fiber was used for stone fragmentation. Results: A total of 20 patients underwent the microperc procedure. The mean age of the patients was 46.5 ± 13.8 years. The mean stone size was 13 ± 3 mm. The stone-free rate (SFR) was 90% (18/20). Two patients had clinically significant residual fragments (= 4 mm). The mean operation and fluoroscopy times were 107.5 ± 37 min and 45 ± 40 s respectively. The mean postoperative drop in hemoglobin was 1.2 ± 0.9 g/dl, and 1 patient required blood transfusion. The patients were discharged after an average hospitalization of 1.4 ± 0.8 days. Two complications, urinary tract infection and blood loss requiring blood transfusion, were observed in 2 patients postoperatively. Conclusions: We suggest that microperc should be considered for the treatment of small renal stones.
ACCESSION #
110397490

 

Related Articles

  • OUTCOME OF FLUOROSCOPY GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF RENAL CALCULI. Ahmad, Tariq; ur Rahman, Ata // Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences;Jan-Mar2014, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p31 

    Background: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is the modality of choice for the surgical management of stones. The objective of this study was to share our experience regarding the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal calculi and its post...

  • Tamsulosin Aids Stone Expulsion.  // Renal & Urology News;Feb2011, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p21 

    The article reports on the effectiveness of Tamsulosin as a treatment to shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for renal and ureteral stones of patients in the U.S.

  • More efficient focusing for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Loske, Achim M.; Prieto, Fernando E. // AIP Conference Proceedings;2001, Vol. 593 Issue 1, p99 

    The purpose of this study was to generate alternative pressure waveforms in order to increase efficiency during non-invasive treatments of nephrolithiasis. Two new systems for electrohydraulic shock wave generators were tested. These devices generate two pressure pulses, instead of only one...

  • Lithotripsy Okay for Lower Pole Stones.  // Renal & Urology News;Jun2013, Vol. 12 Issue 6, p28 

    The article reports on a research finding which showed that extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been favorably efficient in treating lower pole renal stones.

  • Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy: A Comparison of Intraoperative Radiation Exposure During the Management of Nephrolithiasis. Rebuck, David A.; Coleman, Sarah; Chen, Jian-Feng; Casey, Jessica T.; Perry, Kent T.; Nadler, Robert B. // Journal of Endourology;Jun2012, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p597 

    Background and Purpose: Both shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) may be used in the treatment of similar stones and both need fluoroscopic imaging to achieve this. Fluoroscopy, however, is a source of ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study is to compare the effective...

  • SAY GOODBYE TO KIDNEY STONES. Pechter, Kerry // Prevention;Sep89, Vol. 41 Issue 9, p58 

    Discusses extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, a non-surgical treatment for kidney stones. Factors that contribute to the development of kidney stones; Mechanism behind the formation of kidney stones; Use of thiazides, allopurinol and thiola in preventing stone formation; Importance of...

  • Design of the Dual Stone Locating System on an Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotriptor. Pu, Yong-Ren; Manousakas, Ioannis; Liang, Shen-Min; Chang, Chien-Chen // Sensors (14248220);Jan2013, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1319 

    Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotriptors are very popular for the treatment of urinary stones all over the world. They depend basically upon either X-ray fluoroscopy or ultrasound scans to detect the stones before therapy begins. To increase the effectiveness of treatment this study took...

  • The Role of Microperc in the Treatment of Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi. Tepeler, Abdulkadir; Armagan, Abdullah; Sancaktutar, Ahmet Ali; Silay, Mesrur Selcuk; Penbegul, Necmettin; Akman, Tolga; Hatipoglu, Namık Kemal; Ersoz, Cevper; Erdem, Mehmet Remzi; Akcay, Muzaffer // Journal of Endourology;Jan2013, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p13 

    Background and Purpose: The treatment of symptomatic lower pole (LP) calculi poses a challenge because of lower clearance rates. We present our experience with microperc in the treatment of LP renal calculi. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the symptomatic patients with LP...

  • Ultrasonography Combined with Fluoroscopy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: An Analysis Based on Seven Years Single Center Experiences. Qinglong Chi; Yan Wang; Ji Lu; Xiaoqing Wang; Yuanyuan Hao; Zhihua Lu; Jinghai Hu; Fengming Jiang; Qihui Chen; Haifeng Zhang; Ning Xu; Yuchuan Hou; Chunxi Wang; Yanbo Wang // Urology Journal;Winter2014, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p1216 

    13 to 70 years) who underwent 582 PCNL from March 2004 to October 2011 in our department. Results: Of participants, 89.6% experienced less than 3 puncture times; 2 patients (0.4%) experienced puncture failures; percentage of single or multiple tracts was 89.7% and 10.3%, respectively, 55...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics