TITLE

Recovery and Preemption: The Collision of the Medicare Secondary Payer Act and the Medical Device Amendments

AUTHOR(S)
Horvath, George
PUB. DATE
October 2015
SOURCE
California Law Review;Oct2015, Vol. 103 Issue 5, p1353
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Congress often uses its power to preempt state laws when a uniform nationwide regulatory environment is desirable. Unfortunately, preemption may have unintended, far-reaching effects. When Congress enacted the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 ("MDA"), it included an express preemption clause to ensure that only the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") could establish ex ante, premarket requirements for medical devices, thus allowing the Agency to establish a uniform regulatory floor. Just four years later, Congress enacted the Medicare Secondary Payer Act ("MSP"), part of a series of amendments to the Medicare program designed to improve the program's finances. The MSP included provisions that allow the United States to recover payments Medicare had made on behalf of its beneficiaries, by standing in the place of those beneficiaries in state tort actions against tortfeasors. These provisions gave Medicare broad authority to seek recovery from the manufacturers of defective medical devices when the program had paid for the devices. However, in many cases the express preemption clause of the MDA and the Supreme Court's overly broad implied preemption jurisprudence preempt Medicare beneficiaries' state law claims. Since Medicare's ability to recover under the MSP is based on its beneficiaries' rights, the MDA may also prevent Medicare from recovering under the MSP. This collision between two statutes drafted within four years of one another illustrates the unintended effects that a broad preemption doctrine may have. This Comment argues that both Congress and the Supreme Court need to review and narrow the reach of preemption under the MDA--without completely abandoning preemption--so that both the MDA and the MSP may serve the purposes Congress intended.
ACCESSION #
110349963

 

Related Articles

  • Erie and Preemption: Killing One Bird with Two Stones. RENSBERGER, JEFFREY L. // Indiana Law Journal;Fall2015, Vol. 90 Issue 4, p1591 

    The Supreme Court has developed a standard account of the Erie doctrine. The Court has directed different analyses of Erie cases depending upon whether the federal law in question is in the form of a federal rule (or statute) or is instead a judge-made law. But the cases applying the doctrine...

  • THE PUZZLE OF PARALLEL CLAIMS, PREEMPTION, AND PLEADING THE PARTICULARS. Prince, J. David // William Mitchell Law Review;2012, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p1034 

    The article discusses America's preemption doctrine in relation to parallel claims and plaintiffs' crafting of pleadings of particulars in litigation involving potential violations of American state and federal medical device (MD) laws. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval process...

  • DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING OF RESTRICTED, SURGICALLY IMPLANTED MEDICAL DEVICES: WHAT DOES THE ADVERTISING ARENA LOOK LIKE, AND WHOSE REGULATORY PROBLEM IS IT? Patsner, Bruce // William Mitchell Law Review;2012, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p1207 

    The article discusses the legal and regulatory aspects of the advertising and promotion of medical devices (MDs) to consumers in the U.S. as of 2012, and it mentions a statutory framework for MD classification and regulation of advertising, as well as direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of...

  • The Deregulatory Effects of Preempting Tort Litigation. Gostin, Lawrence O. // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;5/21/2008, Vol. 299 Issue 19, p2313 

    The author comments on the implication of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding the Medical Device Amendment of 1976 (MDA), which bars legal claims challenging the safety and effectiveness of medical devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Particular attention is paid to the...

  • Pre-emption opponents work to overturn ruling. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;3/16/2009, Vol. 43 Issue 11, p4 

    The article reports on the efforts of the supporters of the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 to overturn a U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Donna S. Riegel vs. Medtronic Inc. The decision held that the pre-emption clause in the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 prevents common law claims...

  • Third Circuit Decides Long-Awaited Antidepressant Drug Labeling Preemption Cases.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses several court cases which addressed issues concerning anti-depressant drug labeling preemption in the U.S. In the case of Riegel versus Medtronic Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pre-market approval of a Class III medical device...

  • Preemption in Medical Device Litigation: What Has Changed Since Riegel? Trasatti, Marisa A.; Graham, Jhanelle A. // FDCC Quarterly;Spring2012, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p263 

    The article discusses state and legislative developments in the U.S. after the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. (Riegel) that the pre-emption clause of the Medical Device Amendment of 1976 bars state common-law claims that challenges the safety of a medical device...

  • Preemption Review. Kux, Leslie // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;10/5/2011, Vol. 76 Issue 193, p61565 

    This article discusses about the final rules by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its views on the preemptive effect of both the regulation's codified provisions and the FD&C Act. The article further discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision addressing the preamble to physician...

  • U.S. federal safety standards, guidelines and regulations for MRI systems: An overview. Delfino, Jana G. // Applied Radiology;Apr2015, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p20 

    No abstract available.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics