TITLE

Evaluation of Performance With an Adaptive Digital Remote Microphone System and a Digital Remote Microphone Audio-Streaming Accessory System

AUTHOR(S)
Wolfe, Jace; Duke, Mila Morais; Schafer, Erin; Jones, Christine; Mülder, Hans E.; John, Andrew; Hudson, Mary
PUB. DATE
September 2015
SOURCE
American Journal of Audiology;Sep2015, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p440
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: One purpose of this study was to evaluate the improvement in speech recognition obtained with use of 2 different remote microphone technologies. Another purpose of this study was to determine whether a battery of audiometric measures could predict benefit from use of these technologies. Method: Sentence recognition was evaluated while 17 adults used each of 2 different hearing aids. Performance was evaluated with and without 2 different remote microphone systems. A variety of audiologic measures were administered to determine whether prefitting assessment may predict benefit from remote microphone technology. Results: Use of both remote microphone systems resulted in improvement in speech recognition in quiet and in noise. There were no differences in performance obtained with the 2 different remote microphone technologies in quiet and at low competing noise levels, but use of the digital adaptive remote microphone system provided better speech recognition in the presence of moderate- to high-level noise. The Listening in Spatialized Noise–Sentence Test Prescribed Gain Amplifier (Cameron & Dillon, 2010) measure served as a good predictor of benefit from remote microphone technology. Conclusions: Each remote microphone system improved sentence recognition in noise, but greater improvement was obtained with the digital adaptive system. The Listening in Spatialized Noise–Sentence Test Prescribed Gain Amplifier may serve as a good indicator of benefit from remote microphone technology.
ACCESSION #
110258389

 

Related Articles

  • The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance. Oeding, Kristi; Valente, Michael // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jun2015, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p547 

    Background: One important factor that plays a role in front-end processing is the analog-to-digital converter within current hearing aids. The average input dynamic range of hearing aids is 96 dB SPL with an upper input limiting level (UILL) of 95-105 dB SPL. The UILL of standard hearing aids...

  • Factors Affecting Reliability and Validity of Self-Directed Automatic In Situ Audiometry: Implications for Self-Fitting Hearing Aids. Convery, Elizabeth; Keidser, Gitte; Seeto, Mark; Yeend, Ingrid; Freeston, Katrina // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jan2015, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p5 

    Background: A reliable and valid method for the automatic in situ measurement of hearing thresholds is a prerequisite for the feasibility of a self-fitting hearing aid, whether such a device becomes an automated component of an audiological management program or is fitted by the user...

  • The Relationship between High-Frequency Pure-Tone Hearing Loss, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) Thresholds, and the Articulation Index. Vermiglio, Andrew J.; Soli, Sigfrid D.; Freed, Daniel J.; Fisher, Laurel M. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Nov/Dec2012, Vol. 23 Issue 10, p779 

    Background: Speech recognition in noise testing has been conducted at least since the 1940s (Dickson et al, 1946). The ability to recognize speech in noise is a distinct function of the auditory system (Plomp, 1978). According to Kochkin (2002), difficulty recognizing speech in noise is the...

  • Better Together: Reduced Compliance After Sequential Versus Simultaneous Bilateral Hearing Aids Fitting. Lavie, Limor; Banai, Karen; Attias, Joseph; Karni, Avi // American Journal of Audiology;Mar2014, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p93 

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of sequential versus simultaneous bilateral hearing aids fitting on patient compliance. Method: Thirty-six older adults with hearing impairment participated in this study. Twelve were fitted with bilateral hearing aids...

  • Impact of Electric Stimulation on Residual Hearing. Dillon, Margaret T.; Bucker, Andrea L.; Adunka, Marcia C.; King, English R.; Adunka, Oliver F.; Buchman, Craig A.; Pillsbury, Harold C. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Sep2015, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p732 

    Background: Candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation are expanding to include patients with substantial low-to-mid frequency hearing sensitivity. Postoperative hearing preservation has been achieved in cochlear implant recipients, though with variable outcomes. Previous investigations on...

  • Stimuli and Normative Data for Detection of Ling-6 Sounds in Hearing Level. Scollie, Susan; Glista, Danielle; Tenhaaf, Julianne; Dunn, Andrea; Malandrino, April; Keene, Kelley; Folkeard, Paula // American Journal of Audiology;Dec2012, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p232 

    Purpose: The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a calibrated version of the Ling-6 sounds for evaluation of aided detection thresholds. Stimuli were recorded, and data from calibration values in dB HL were developed. Aided performance was characterized in adults and children....

  • 10 Questions About Frequency Compression. POWERS, THOMAS A.; HEUERMANN, HEIKE; HANNEMANN, RONNY // Hearing Review;Oct2013, Vol. 20 Issue 11, p22 

    This article reviews 10 of the most commonly asked questions regarding the fitting applications of frequency compression technology in Siemens micon, and provides guidelines designed to foster optimum implementation.

  • Comparison of Multichannel Wide Dynamic Range Compression and ChannelFree Processing Strategies on Consonant Recognition. Plyler, Patrick; Hedrick, Mark; Rinehart, Brittany; Tripp, Rebekah // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jul/Aug2015, Vol. 26 Issue 7, p607 

    Background: Both wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) and ChannelFree (CF) processing strategies in hearing aids were designed to improve listener comfort and consonant identification, yet few studies have actually compared them. Purpose: To determine whether CF processing provides equal or...

  • The Effectiveness of the Directional Microphone in the Oticon Medical Ponto Pro in Participants with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Oeding, Kristi; Valente, Michael // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Sep2013, Vol. 24 Issue 8, p701 

    Background: Current bone anchored hearing solutions (BAHSs) have incorporated automatic adaptive multichannel directional microphones (DMs). Previous fixed single-channel hypercardioid DMs in BAHSs have provided benefit in a diffuse listening environment, but little data are available on the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics