TITLE

BAN SPURS NICHE BITCH

AUTHOR(S)
Dunkley, Cathy; Rooney, David
PUB. DATE
October 2003
SOURCE
Daily Variety;10/1/2003, Vol. 280 Issue 63, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the efforts of various Hollywood film studios to ban Oscar Award screeners in Los Angeles, California. Assessment on the quality of the movies; Level of competition; Reduction on the costs of screening.
ACCESSION #
10986463

 

Related Articles

  • Adding up studio tally is tricky math. Block, Alex Ben // Hollywood Reporter;2/15/95, Vol. 336 Issue 2, p9 

    Discusses the nominations for the 1995 Academy Awards according to the movie production and distribution companies that made them. Miramax as garnering most number of nominations.

  • Are studios playing favorites. Gray, Timothy M. // Variety;12/17/2001, Vol. 385 Issue 5, p73 

    Deals with how film studios ÷ their attention among Academy Awards nominees. Candidates from New Line Cinema, Warner Bros. and Miramax studios; Indicators of whom to support most; Disadvantages of having many contenders in a year.

  • OSCAR'S SAT.-NIGHT FEVER. Higgins, Bill // Variety;03/12/2001, Vol. 382 Issue 4, p4 

    Reports on the decision made by some motion picture studios to celebrate the 2001 Academy Awards the night before its scheduled date. Studios that will forgo with the celebrations.

  • Planners' Saturday night fever. Higgins, Bill // Variety;2/18/2002, Vol. 386 Issue 1, p57 

    Deals with the planning of film studios for parties on the 2002 Academy Awards. Nomination that serve as a basis for having a party during the Oscars; Factors that are being considered in planning for a party; Concerns of planners on having parties during Oscar night.

  • H'WOOD BREAKS GOLD MOLD. Hayes, Dade // Variety;03/19/2001, Vol. 382 Issue 5, p1 

    Presents information on the campaign strategies used by film studios for their motion pictures nominated for the Oscar Awards in 2001. Emphasis on the social and political importance of the motion pictures; Public appearances by nominated celebrities; Increased spending on television...

  • Acad members run from screening room. Harris, Dana // Daily Variety;10/1/2003, Vol. 280 Issue 63, p1 

    Details the reactions of the Academy members over the decision of the Motion Picture Association of America to ban the mailing of members for Oscar considerations in Los Angeles, California. Causes of piracy; Effects of the ban on various film studios; Assessment on the quality of the movies.

  • Screener mortis.  // Daily Variety;10/1/2003, Vol. 280 Issue 63, p19 

    Editorial. Focuses on the banning of motion pictures screeners in the 2003 Oscar Award in New York City. Way of fighting against the piracy of digital video discs and videocassettes; Factors affecting the earnings of various sound recording studios; Details on the support of several artists on...

  • Oscars' screener stream still a dream. Siegel, Tatiana // Variety;1/16/2012, Vol. 425 Issue 9, p9 

    The article considers the electronic distribution of motion pictures by motion picture studios to members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences the purposes of voting on the 2012 Academy Awards, noting that motion picture studios have been reluctant to use streaming video distribution...

  • Oscar Paranoia? How Do We Cope? Tapp, Tom // Variety;10/6/2003 Supplement, Vol. 392 Issue 8, p13 

    Looks at the state of the motion picture industry as the 2004 Oscar Award season approaches. Attitude of motion picture studios to the awards season; Views on the value of the Oscar season; Key to coping with the Oscar paranoia.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics