TITLE

Dubai court judgment on meaning of 'countersignatory' in shipping contracts

PUB. DATE
August 2015
SOURCE
Law Update;8/26/2015, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the decision of the Dubai Court of Appeal which recognizes a foreign arbitral award made against a countersignatory in the United Arab Emirates. The ruling of the Court of Cassation and the second judgment by Court of Appeal are explained. The significance of the decision which clarifies the countersignatory designation may in a charterparty result in the countersignatory deemed to a party to the contract is highlighted
ACCESSION #
109509656

 

Related Articles

  • The need for ministerial approval for arbitral agreements in Egyptian administrative contracts.  // Law Update;8/26/2015, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the Egyptian Court of Cassation with regards to dispute relating to administrative contracts in Egypt. The two opposing interpretations of the Article 1(2) which tackles the dispute between National Gas Co (NGC) and the Egyptian Petroleum Corp. (EGPC) are...

  • CONGRESS AND ORGANIZED LABOR.  // America;4/24/1937, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p60 

    The article discusses the legal aspects of the decision of the Supreme Court in the cases reviewed under the Wagner Act in the U.S. The decision contains many striking passages in which the rights of wage-earners are forcefully defended. The interpretation of the Supreme Court makes possible...

  • Court Rejects Wedding Case. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;4/ 8/2014, pA01 

    4 The Supreme Court refused to hear the case of a New Mexico photo firm that argued its free-speech rights let it decline shooting a same-sex commitment ceremony. The refusal to intervene lets stand a state Supreme Court ruling that Elane Photography violated an N.M. law banning discrimination...

  • Analysts: Timing of Hague decision crucial as election nears. VIRAY, PATRICIA LOURDES // Filipino Reporter;1/22/2015, Vol. 44 Issue 8, p3 

    The article presents the author's views regarding the effect from the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, Netherlands which involves the arbitration case against the Philippines and China to the 2016 elections in the Philippines.

  • When is patent infringement not patent infringement? Merck v Integra and the �safe harbour�. Boyd, Karen I. // Journal of Commercial Biotechnology;Oct2006, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p37 

    The Supreme Court recently ruled on the scope of the patent infringement �safe harbour� of 35 U.S.C. �271(e)(1), which was passed by Congress in 1984 to allow generic drug manufacturers to test their drugs before the expiration of the patents that covered the drugs. The scope of...

  • Disruptive Activity Protected.  // Labor Law Journal;Feb82, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p126 

    The article presents the labor case titled "Koppin v. Coppin State College." The facts and issue of, and the jurisprudence involved and applied to the case are discussed. Two faculty members participated in a student boycott of classes and also joined in student picket lines. A case was filed...

  • THE POWER OF LEGAL PROCESSES AND SECTION 377A OF THE PENAL CODE. CHUA, LYNETTE J. // Singapore Journal of Legal Studies;Dec2012, p457 

    The article offers information on legal processes and section 377A of the penal code in Singapore. It mentions that the Singapore Court of Appeal has issued a decision which elucidates the circumstances under which a person has legal standing for challenging legislation for being in violation of...

  • La sentencia de la Corte mexicana sobre la legalización del aborto: guía de lectura. Giménez, Francisca Pou // Perspectivas Bioéticas;2009, Vol. 14 Issue 26/27, p131 

    This note intends to guide and support the reading of the Mexican Supreme Court 2008 abortion opinion, where Mexico City legislation legalizing abortion during the first trimester was declared to be constitutional. The author refers to the way the majority opinion is to be articulated with the...

  • Calif. high court to review same-sex marriage.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;12/28/2006, Issue 992, p13 

    The article reports on the unanimous decision of the California Supreme Court in San Francisco, to decide on the issue about same-sex marriage. Moreover, they are reviewing whether California's ban on same-sex marriage violates a constitutional ban on discrimination. According to San Francisco...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics