TITLE

Split decision in NVO-TSA rematch

AUTHOR(S)
Edmonson, R.G.
PUB. DATE
September 2003
SOURCE
Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);9/22/2003, Vol. 4 Issue 38, p46
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Provides information on the decision of the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission on the complaints of Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (TSA) members against non-vessel-operating common carriers (NVOCC) in contracting, as of September 2003. Settlement costs which TSA members are willing to pay; Allegations of the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders of America and the International Association of NVOCC against TSA members; Reason behind the decision of TSA members to negotiate a settlement with NVOCC.
ACCESSION #
10889385

 

Related Articles

  • Carriers try again to restrict capacity. Mongelluzzo, Bill // JoC Week;9/17/2001, Vol. 2 Issue 37, p14 

    Focuses on the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement of the U.S. carriers aimed to develop capacity management program for effective vessel capacity management in the trade. Opposition to the scheme by the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission; Challenges before the carriers; Purchase of vessels by...

  • FMC grants NVOCCs the right to negotiate shipper contracts. Calderwood, James A. // Logistics Today;Feb2005, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p13 

    Reports that the Federal Maritime Commission has issued final regulations permitting non-vessel-operating common carriers to enter into contract arrangements with shippers. Terms under the contract; Responsibility of carriers for loss, damage or delay of the goods; Negotiation of individual...

  • Ocean Winds.  // Traffic World;11/29/2004, Vol. 268 Issue 48, p4 

    Comments on global developments concerning the maritime industry. Self-proclaimed mission of the Trans-Atlantic Conference Agreement; Federal Maritime Commission's issuance of a rule extending confidential contract authority to nonvessel operating common carriers in 2005 in the United States;...

  • Distribution-Publications Inc. Devine Jr., James E. // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);1/10/2005 Supp Bottleneck, p99 

    Forecasts the benefits of the decision of the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission to allow non-vessel-operating (NVO) common carriers to enter into confidential NVO service agreements (NSA) with shippers. Ability of NVO to enter into written contracts with their shipper clients for ocean and...

  • More smoke than fire. Mongelluzzo, Bill // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);3/28/2005, Vol. 6 Issue 13, p44 

    Focuses on rules regarding the non-vessel-operating common carriers service arrangement published by the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission. Provisions of the service arrangement; Information on confidential contracts signed by non-vessel-operating common carriers with their customers; Views of...

  • NVOs to FMC: Time to act. Bonney, Joseph // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);8/9/2004, Vol. 5 Issue 32, p6 

    Comments on a request submitted by non-vessel-operating common carriers (NVO) to the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission to allow them to sign confidential contracts with shippers. Reason behind the request; Provisions of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act; Background on the NVO that signed the request.

  • The snooze that greeted the news. Tirschwell, Peter // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);11/22/2004, Vol. 5 Issue 47, p38 

    Comments on the news that non-vessel-operating common carriers will be given the right to sign confidential contracts with proprietary shippers. Possible elimination of the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission if it denied the right to sign confidential contracts; Transformation of the...

  • Not much of a splash. Mongelluzzo, Bill // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);9/29/2003, Vol. 4 Issue 39, p12 

    Deals with the move of the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission to settle a case in which container lines were accused of discriminating against non-vessel-operating common carriers in contracting. Discussion on the effect of the settlement on contract negotiations; Comment from Bob Coleman,...

  • Victory is within NVOs' grasp. Edmonson, R. G. // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);10/11/2004, Vol. 5 Issue 41, p25 

    Explains that the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission is going to decide whether non-vessel-operating (NVO) common carriers will be allowed to offer confidential contracts. Proposal from several NVOs with service contracts that they be exempted from tariff requirements; Advantages of NVOs in cargo...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics