TITLE

Marriage ruling streamlines benefits administration

AUTHOR(S)
Otto, Nick; Davis, Andrea
PUB. DATE
June 2015
SOURCE
Ebn.benefitsnews.com;6/26/2015, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Friday's landmark ruling on gay marriage poses both challenges and benefits to employers.
ACCESSION #
108306419

 

Related Articles

  • Dignity, Dystopia and the Meaning of Marriage. Tenaglia, Michael // Human Life Review;Fall2015, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p64 

    The article discusses an oral argument in Supreme Court and mentions marriage and mentions dignity and dystopia. Topics discussed include marriage laws, gays and lawyer Mary Bonauto. Other topics which includes animus, ancient philosophers and discrimination against gays are also discussed....

  • The Month in Marriage.  // Outlook Ohio Magazine;Nov2014, Vol. 19 Issue 6, p7 

    The article focuses on the increase of states in the U.S. that issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Topics discussed include the decision about marriage equality made by the U.S. Supreme Court on October 6, 2014, the inclusion of marriage equality in the marriage law of 32 U.S. states...

  • Hollingsworth v Perry. Thayer, Donlu; Worley, Michael // Oxford Journal of Law & Religion;Oct2013, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p469 

    Constitutional rights – United States – Federal procedure – Standing to defend – California citizen initiative defining marriage as between a man and a woman challenged by same-sex couples in federal district court as unconstitutional violation of equal protection and...

  • US rulings bolster gay union.  // Telegraph (Calcutta, India);6/26/2013, p1 

    The article focuses on a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court as of June 26, 2013, which mentioned that married gay and lesbian couples are entitled to federal benefits. It reports that the ruling overturned the U.S. Defence of Marriage Act, and further discusses a case in California in which the...

  • Preventing Backlash POST-DOMA. Mihelich, Max // Diversity Executive;Jan/Feb2014, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p28 

    The article reports on the invalidation of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) by the U.S. Supreme Court. Topics covered include the impact of the ruling on same-sex couples and the employers' need to focus on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer community issues...

  • After DOMA ruling, few fighting words from congressional GOP on gay marriage.  // Moderate Voice;6/26/2013, p2 

    A cartoon is presented regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on gay marriage, and on the struck down of Defense of Marriage Act.

  • Revisiting domestic-partner coverage after Obergefell.  // HR Weekly;8/17/2015, Vol. 3 Issue 33, p4 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which states that employers that provide spousal benefits to anyone must extend them to all legally married employees, regardless of a spouse's gender.

  • Federal appeals Court: Utah Can't Ban Gay Marriage. Riccardi, Nicholas; McCombs, Brady // Bay Windows;6/26/2014, Vol. 32 Issue 29, p1 

    The article informs that on June 25, 2014 federal appeals court in Denver, Colorado, ruled for the first time that states should allow gay couples to marry after the Supreme Court struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

  • DOMA RULING FORCES BENEFITS REDO.  // Business Insurance;7/1/2013, Vol. 47 Issue 13, p0012 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that invalidated the 1996 federal law that barred recognition of same-sex marriages. The ruling declaring the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional extends employer-provided benefits such as health insurance to same-sex couples in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics