Suit Filed to Block $225 Million In W. Va. Lottery-Backed Bonds

Newman, Emily
September 2003
Bond Buyer;9/11/2003, Vol. 345 Issue 31717, p6
Trade Publication
Reports on a suit filed challenging the West Virginia Economic Development Grant Committee's decision to issue a certain amount of lottery-backed revenue bonds to fund several grants. Person on behalf of whom the lawsuit was filed; Concerns of the person who filed the lawsuit regarding the grant committee's criteria for awarding grants; Other legal action brought against the grant committee by this person.


Related Articles

  • Judge Clears Way for Camden Recovery Bonds. Braun, Martin Z. // Bond Buyer;3/19/2003, Vol. 343 Issue 31596, p1 

    New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew J. Smithson dismissed on March 18, 2003 two lawsuits by Camden residents challenging the constitutionality of the city's economic recovery legislation, clearing the way for a 175 million dollar sale of state appropriation-backed bonds to revitalize the...

  • Oklahoma Lawsuit Could Break $156 Million Bond Package. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;09/18/2000, Vol. 333 Issue 30977, p43 

    Focuses on the lawsuit filed by Representative Russ Roach against a revenue bond issue for state capital improvement plan in Oklahoma. Concern over industrial projects to be funded by bond proceeds; Contention on the illegality of the bond issue; Target date for the availability of funds.

  • Okla. High Court Declines to Hear Anti-Bond Case. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/04/2000, Vol. 334 Issue 31029, p7 

    Reports the lifting of the case against blocking the bonds sale by the Oklahoma Capital Improvement Finance Authority following the Supreme Court refusal to hear the case in Oklahoma. Purpose of the hearing refusal; Reasons on the alleged unconstitutionality of the bond issues; Causes of the...

  • SOUTHWEST Bond-Watch. Watts, Jim; Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/14/2004, Vol. 350 Issue 32029, p27 

    The article analyzes different bonds by southwestern States of United States. In Arizona Tucson Unified School District may allow businesses to advertise products and services on the district's school buses as a way to generate money for schools. A 2002 court order by the Arkansas Supreme Court...

  • Illinois probe of Chicago suburb could affect 1993 IDFA bonds. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;06/15/99, Vol. 328 Issue 30662, p28 

    Reports that the Illinois Attorney General's office has launched an investigation into whether Chicago, Illinois' decision not to pursue reimbursement for a lawsuit settlement violated the conditions of issuance. Revenue bonds issued by the Illinois Development Finance Authority.

  • Second Clinton Park Lawsuit Holds Up Other Arkansas Revenue Deals. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/3/2001, Vol. 337 Issue 31195, p34 

    Reports on a lawsuit attacking the constitutionality of a 16 million dollar Little Rock, Arkansas bond sale. Postponement of other revenue bond issues in the state; Details of the lawsuit.

  • Judge Issues Deadline for Dallas River Project Case. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/29/2001, Vol. 337 Issue 31213, p40 

    Focuses on a lawsuit determining the legality of selling bonds for a project without the approval of the voters in Dallas, Texas. Schedule of the case trials set by judge Anne Ashby; Claims of the Taxpayers for Sensible Priorities over the illegality of the sale of the debt; Overview of the case.

  • Referendum Denied. D'Ambrosio, Jill // Bond Buyer;6/28/2004, Vol. 348 Issue 31914, p35 

    Reports on the New Jersey Supreme Court's denial of a request to hear a case filed on behalf of a group that had lobbied Newark officials to hold a public referendum on the use of about $200 million in bond proceeds. Bases of the court's decision.

  • Tax Cases: Advance Notes.  // Accountancy;Aug1966, Vol. 77 Issue 876, p583 

    This article focuses on the decision of the Court of Appeals on tax cases in Great Britain. In "Muir v. C.I.R.," the Court of Appeal has reversed the decision of J. Pennycuick, who held invalid the 1952 variation of a deed of settlement of 1947. In "Lawson v. Hosemaster Co. Ltd.," the Court of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics