TITLE

Supreme Court's ERISA decision could increase health plan costs

PUB. DATE
September 2003
SOURCE
Employee Benefit News;9/15/2003, Vol. 17 Issue 12, p46
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses how the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court on four cases involving Employees Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) could increase health plan costs. Issues associated with ERISA; Facts of the cases; Reactions to the court's rulings.
ACCESSION #
10819214

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court Rules That ERISA Preempts State Law Claims over HMO Coverage Decisions. Jacobster, Michael D. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q2, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has decided on June 21, 2004 that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) solely governs suits and remedies relating to a Health Maintenance Organization's coverage decisions based on the terms of an ERISA-governed plan. The aspect of...

  • A Comment on Breeden-Brush Prudent Investing and the Calculation of Economic Damages. DeBrock, Larry; Linke, Charles M. // Journal of Legal Economics;Oct2009, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p29 

    The authors present a comment to the article "The Plaintiff as Victim and Investor: Prudent Investing and the Calculation of Economic Damages," by Charles Breeden and Brian Brush (B&B). They analyze the views of B&B on the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co....

  • LaRue is expected to prevail, but many say that should not worry employers. Whiddon, Robert L. // Employee Benefit Adviser;Feb2008, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p16 

    The article discusses the issue of whether an individual can sue to recover investment losses resulting from an administrative mistake and whether plans would have to pay real money to correct such mistakes, in light of the U.S. Supreme Court case LaRue v. DeWolff. The case involves James LaRue,...

  • LEGAL UPDATE. Hesse, Kathrine A.; Ehrens, Doris R. MacKenzie // Benefits Quarterly;2000 First Quarter, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p83 

    The article presents several lawsuits from the United States Supreme Court for the first quarter of 2000 which deal with employees benefits retirement plan and insurance. In the case of Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson, the Supreme Court held that an employer plan sponsor does not act as a...

  • SCOTUS Upholds Litigation Limitation Period. Manganaro, John // Plan Sponsor News;2013, p56 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the judgment of two lower courts in a lawsuit testing litigation limitations within plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The court approved a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the District of...

  • LEGAL UPDATE. Hesse, Katherine A.; Ehrens, Doris R. MacKenzie; Hesse, Murphy // Benefits Quarterly;2004 Fourth Quarter, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p61 

    This article features judgment rationales on actions and defenses related to the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) as of December 2004. In Feifer v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, the 2nd Circuit court ruled that a memorandum and program summary that was the only written...

  • Supreme Court's Anticlimactic Decision in Glenn does not Streamline ERISA Litigation.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn. Metropolitan Life was an administrator and the insurer of Sears, Roebuck & Co.'s long-term disability insurance plan, an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)-covered employee benefit plan....

  • Clear, Voluntary, and Made in Good Faith: An Alternative to the Supreme Court's Incorrect Approach to Resolving Conflicts Between Common Law Waivers and ERISA Plan Documents in Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan. Ward, Geoff // Tax Lawyer;Summer2011, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p1003 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan. It was held that the plan administrator has performed its statutory duty under the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by naming Liv Kennedy, wife of...

  • SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS AND ERISA Protection. ZALL, MILT // Strategic Finance;Sep2004, Vol. 86 Issue 3, p55 

    The article considers a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Yates v. Hendon, regarding the legality of employer/owner inclusion in an employee retirement plan established under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The article explains the facts of the case, the case for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics