TITLE

Mammographic Screening in Asymptomatic Women Aged 40 Years and Older

PUB. DATE
May 1989
SOURCE
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;5/5/89, Vol. 261 Issue 17, p2535
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the differences in age-specific recommendations for screening mammograms in asymptomatic women developed by professional, voluntary, and governmental organizations. Epidemiologic evidence that mammographic screening in asymptomatic women aged 50 or older reduces breast cancer mortality; Mortality and survival follow-up on subjects aged 40 to 49; Cost of mammographic screening.
ACCESSION #
10811141

 

Related Articles

  • The mammography consensus jury speaks out. Nelson, Nancy J. // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;03/05/97, Vol. 89 Issue 5, p344 

    Reports on criticisms of various sectors on the decision of a panel of experts not to recommend mammography for women in their 40s as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer. Composition of the panel for the mammography conference; Randomized trials of mammographic screening including women under...

  • Trends in Screening Mammograms for Women 50 Years of Age and Older—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;4/14/89, Vol. 261 Issue 14, p2031 

    Reports on trends in screening mammograms for women 50 years of age and older in the U.S. 1987 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; Importance of screening mammograms for the early detection of breast cancer in women and for the subsequent reduction of breast cancer mortality; Efforts of...

  • Film mammography is still the one. Meloro, J.R. // Contemporary OB/GYN;Aug2001, Vol. 46 Issue 8, p114 

    Evaluates the use of film mammography for breast cancer detection in the United States. Effectivity of the method for early detection of cancer; Necessity of screening technology for breast cancer; Features of the full-field digital mammography.

  • New Web site to help with mammography decision making.  // HealthFacts;Feb98, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p6 

    Reports on the launch of the Web site dubbed `Potential Benefits and Risks of Mammograms' by the University of California in San Francisco. Provision of a guideline for mammography decision-making; Risk of false alarms during screening tests.

  • The breast is close to the heart. Fletcher, Suzanne W.; Fletcher, Robert H.; Fletcher, S W; Fletcher, R H // Annals of Internal Medicine;12/1/92, Vol. 117 Issue 11, p969 

    Presents information on the health implications of breast cancer screening with physical examination and mammography. Risk for dying of breast cancer; Variations of the biology of breast cancer among age groups; Problems in breast cancer screening.

  • The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast Cancer Mortality after 11 to 16 Years of Follow-up. Miller, Anthony B.; To, Teresa; Baines, Cornelia J.; Wall, Claus // Annals of Internal Medicine;9/3/2002, Vol. 137 Issue 5, p305 

    Background: The efficacy of breast cancer screening in women age 40 to 49 years remains controversial. Objective: To compare breast cancer mortality in 40- to 49-year-old women who received either 1) screening with annual mammography, breast physical examination, and instruction on breast...

  • Antidote. SIEGEL // Medical Marketing & Media;Dec2009, Vol. 44 Issue 12, p10 

    In this article the author discusses the increased use of mammograms for detecting breast cancer among women.

  • Mammography Screening Does Not Save Lives.  // HealthFacts;Feb2000, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p1 

    Presents the results of a clinical on the effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer.

  • UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer... Wald, Nicholas J.; Murphy, Philip // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/4/95, Vol. 311 Issue 7014, p1189 

    Compares one view and two view mammography in breast cancer screening. Detection of more women with breast cancer by two view mammography; Reduction in recall rates; Cost effectiveness of two view mammography; Economic implications.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics