TITLE

Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States

AUTHOR(S)
Ioannou, George N.; Chapko, Michael K.; Dominitz, Jason A.
PUB. DATE
September 2003
SOURCE
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Sep2003, Vol. 98 Issue 9, p2082
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
: ObjectiveOur aim was to identify predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States and subgroups with particularly low rates of screening.: MethodsThe responses to a telephone-administered questionnaire of a nationally representative sample of 61,068 persons aged ≥50 yr were analyzed. Current screening was defined as either sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the preceding 5 years or fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in the preceding year, or both.: ResultsOverall, current colorectal cancer screening was reported by 43.4% (sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy by 22.8%, FOBT by 9.9%, and both by 10.7%). The lowest rates of screening were reported by the following subgroups: those aged 50–54 yr (31.2%), Hispanics (31.2%), Asian/Pacific Islanders (34.8%), those with education less than the ninth grade (34.4%), no health care coverage (20.4%), or coverage by Medicaid (29.2%), those who had no routine doctor’s visit in the last year (20.3%), and every-day smokers (32.1%). The most important modifiable predictors of current colorectal cancer screening were health care coverage (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.5–1.9) and a routine doctor’s visit in the last year (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 3.2–3.8). FOBT was more common in women than in men (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.6–2.0); sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy was more common in Hispanics (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1–1.7) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR = 2.4, 95% = CI 1.5–3.9) relative to whites, in persons without routine doctor’s visits in the preceding year (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.8–4), and in persons with poor self-reported health (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2–1.5).: ConclusionsInterventions should be developed to improve screening for the subgroups who reported the lowest screening rates. Such interventions may incorporate individual screening strategy preferences.
ACCESSION #
10807814

 

Related Articles

  • Closely Screen Relatives of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Patients.  // Modern Medicine;Oct98, Vol. 66 Issue 10, p12 

    Discusses the abstract of the article `Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with `sporadic' colorectal cancer: A case control study,' by A. Pariente, C. Milan et al, published in the July 1998 issue of the `Gastroenterology' periodical.

  • A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy Harewood, Gavin C.; Wiersema, Maurits J.; Melton III, L. Joseph // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec2002, Vol. 97 Issue 12, p3186 

    OBJECTIVES:Medicare beneficiaries now have access to screening colonoscopy (SC). For colon cancer screening to be fruitful, SC must become more acceptable to a broad segment of this population. However, we currently lack knowledge of which aspects of SC have an impact on patient acceptance. The...

  • Back Door Blues. Thornton, Jim // GQ: Gentlemen's Quarterly;Apr2003, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p112 

    Presents the author's experiences with colonoscopy. Participation in a National Cancer Institute trial to undergo three successive colonoscopies at the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center; Use of colonoscopies to detect colon cancer; Annual number of colon and rectal cancer cases in...

  • The importance of getting a screening colonoscopy. Tariq, Syed // St. Charles Journal;7/18/2012, Vol. 47 Issue 29, pA7 

    The author explains why a colonoscopy is necessary for diagnosing any cancerous growth in the colon.

  • Is colonoscopy the best screening method for everyone?  // PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News;10/2/2010, Issue 613, p9 

    The article discusses research on colonoscopy as the best screening method for colorectal cancer, which references the study "When Budgets Are Tight, There Are Better Options Than Colonoscopies for Colorectal Cancer Screening," by S. Subramanian et al.

  • Clinicopathological Characteristics of Newly Diagnosed Colorectal Cancers in Community Gastroenterology Practice. Chang Kyun Lee // Intestinal Research;2014, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p87 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including the characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis, the increase of CRCs' occurrence amongst younger demographics, and the use of colonoscopy as a screening method for CRC.

  • Rooting Out a Major Killer. Rainey, Susan // Newsweek;7/31/2000, Vol. 136 Issue 5, p59 

    Reports on two studies presented by the New England Journal of Medicine that suggest that colonoscopy is the most effective way to detect pre-cancerous growths in the colon. Other recommended test for detecting colon cancer, known as sigmoidoscopy; Discomfort associated with colonoscopy; Costs...

  • New Cancer Screening Guidelines Say Less Is More. McBride, Deborah // ONS Connect;Apr2009, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p18 

    The article discusses the revised guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) about cancer screening. The guidelines limit screening. Instead of a colonoscopy, less invasive therapies should be used for colon cancer screening in patients over 85-years old. Prostate cancer...

  • Screening and Diagnosis.  // Current Medical Literature: Colorectal Cancer;2011, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p120 

    Reviews of the articles "High detection rate of adenomas in familial colorectal cancer," by H. Morreau and colleagues, "The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer," by H. Singh and colleagues, and "Level of fellowship training increase adenoma...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics