TITLE

Appeals Court Won't Review Ruling Against U.S. Trust in Holmes Harbor Case

AUTHOR(S)
Hume, Lynn
PUB. DATE
September 2003
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;9/5/2003, Vol. 345 Issue 31713, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the Washington state Court of Appeals will not review a lower court judge's ruling that refused to dismiss investors' securities fraud charges against the U.S. Trust Co. in a municipal bond case involving the Holmes Harbor Sewer District. Details of the Holmes Harbor case; Revelation that the Holmes Harbor case is headed for a jury trial; Background of the case.
ACCESSION #
10793506

 

Related Articles

  • CLEARING THE AIR: ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE IN TAKE-HOME ASBESTOS EXPOSURE LITIGATION. Levine, Rebecca Leah // Washington Law Review;May2011, Vol. 86 Issue 2, p359 

    Since 2005, take-home asbestos exposure claims have constituted a new wave of asbestos litigation. In contrast to employees exposed to asbestos at a worksite, take-home exposure occurred among those affected by employees who inadvertently carried asbestos home on their clothing or their tools....

  • Seattle federation gunman loses appeal. J. T. A. // New Jersey Jewish News;2/2/2012, Vol. 66 Issue 5, p20 

    The article reports on the decision of the Washington State Court of Appeals to uphold the conviction of Naveed Haq, who shot up the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle building in July 2006.

  • URBANITES VERSUS RURAL RIGHTS: CONTEST OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAND-USE REGULATIONS UNDER WASHINGTON PREEMPTION STATUTE 82.02.020. Williamson, Donya // Washington Law Review;Aug2009, Vol. 84 Issue 3, p491 

    In Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights v. Suns,' the Court of Appeals of Washington held that King County clearing and grading regulations-recently enacted pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act-constitute an unlawful "tax, fee, or charge" on the development of land, thereby...

  • Guilt grip. Shapiro, Alexandra; Malionek, Robert // Lawyer;12/3/2007, Vol. 21 Issue 47, p29 

    The article focuses on the two US Supreme Court ruling in the area of securities litigation in the U.S. The two cases being resolved by Supreme Court includes the Tellabas versus Makor Issues & Rights and Stoneridge Investment versus Scientific-Atlanta, wherein securities fraud claim under...

  • Legal Briefs.  // Business Insurance;2/13/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 7, p12 

    The article provides information on several U.S. court cases in the business insurance industry. According to the Washington Court of Appeals, an employee who was fatally injured in an accident on his bicycle after dropping off his employer's van for servicing special errand for his employer,...

  • LIGHTS OUT IN SEATTLE.  // Public Art Review;Spring/Summer2006, Issue 34, p82 

    The article reports on the response of public artist Jack Mackie to the December 2005 ruling of Seattle, Washington Court of Appeals on the city's percent-for-art ordinance. Jim McDonald, director of the city's Office of Arts and Cultural Affairs, agreed with Mackie and is pushing for policy...

  • Washington State's Government Groups Must Steer Clear of Politics. Stoneman, Bill // Governing;Oct1999, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p54 

    Cites the ruling of the Washington State Court of Appeals that local government associations cannot play the role of advocate before the public because they are public agencies. Provisions of the Washington Public Disclosure Act; Details of the lawsuit brought against the Washington State...

  • BAY ALLEGES STOCK FRAUD. Shprintz, Janet // Daily Variety;12/6/2001, Vol. 274 Issue 4, p20 

    Presents a lawsuit filed by director Michael Bay against his former stockbroker Win Troung in Hollywood, California. Allegation in a securities fraud lawsuit; Move of Bay in filing arbitration proceedings against Merrill Lynch; Content of the complaints.

  • Supreme Court Ruling Stirs Embers Of Yield-Burning Case in Chicago. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;05/26/2000, Vol. 332 Issue 30900, p5 

    Reports on a yield burning case in Chicago, Illinois. Lawsuits brought by citizens against three underwriters and accountants; Decision handed down by the United States Supreme Court.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics