TITLE

Capital Punishment Case Law

PUB. DATE
May 2002
SOURCE
Supreme Court Debates;May2002, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p133
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the U.S. Supreme court's view of death penalty as of May 2002. Details of the movements against death penalty in the U.S.; Details of few cases which dealt with death penalties; Importance of proportionality analysis in death penalties.
ACCESSION #
10699570

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court term focuses on death penalty.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);7/5/2002, Vol. 49 Issue 28, p38A 

    Reports on the efforts of the U.S. Supreme Court in decision for death penalty in New York.

  • Supreme Court Report. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Sep76, Vol. 62 Issue 9, p1184 

    Features U.S. Supreme Court decisions on capital punishment and abortion. 'Gregg v. Georgia'; 'Jurek v. Texas'; 'Proffitt v. Florida'; 'Roberts v. Louisiana.'

  • Editorial: Medellín; In this Issue. J. H. H. W. // European Journal of International Law;Apr2008, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p237 

    This article introduces the issue with a discussion of the U.S. Supreme Court case Medellín v. Texas.

  • THINGS FALL APART, BUT THE CENTER HOLDS: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE DEATH PENALTY. Steiker, Carol S. // New York University Law Review;Dec2002, Vol. 77 Issue 6, p1475 

    Comments on the death penalty decisions made by the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2002. Analysis of the cases involved; Basis of the Court's decision; Implication of the rulings on the administration of capital punishment in the country.

  • The Supreme Court. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;1/29/2015, pA02 

    The article reports that a stay for 3 death row inmates in Oklahoma has been granted by the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • Is Texas Still Executing Mentally Disabled Prisoners? Andrews, Alexandra // Pro Publica;1/ 3/2010, p10 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 ruled that the execution of mentally disabled convicts was unconstitutional however Texas has still been found to be executing mentally disabled prisoners. As stated, the success rate for appeals based on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling is...

  • Judge rejects church view on death penalty. Martin, Michelle // National Catholic Reporter;2/8/2002, Vol. 38 Issue 14, p8 

    Focuses on the disagreement of the U.S. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia with the church's view on death penalty. Scalia's views on moral aspects of death penalty; Verification of evidence before execution of criminals.

  • Special Sessions Take Up Death Sentencing. Lyons, Donna // State Legislatures;Oct/Nov2002, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p13 

    Reports on a special session participated by legislatures in several states in the U.S. to revise their laws on death sentencing after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the death sentence imposed by a judge, not a jury, in the case Ring vs. Arizona was constitutional. States that have been...

  • Inside the Supreme Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Oct2004, Vol. 7 Issue 7, p194 

    The article presents information on the status of key cases granted certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court for consideration during the October 2004 term. Some of the cases are as follows. The case Roper v. Simmons was granted certiorari on January 26, 2004 and is scheduled to be argued on October...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics