Are the State of Missouri's Limits on Contributions to Candidates for State Office Constitutional? CON

November 1999
Supreme Court Debates;Nov99, Vol. 2 Issue 8, p243
Discusses whether the U.S. state of Missouri's limit on contributions to political candidates for state election campaigns is constitutional. Views of the author regarding adverse affects of the limited contribution on political speech of the candidate; Difficulties faced by political candidates in providing proper information to voters regarding their positions; Effects of limited contribution on candidate's ability to campaign.


Related Articles

  • MISSOURI. Combest, John // Campaigns & Elections (1996);Sep2007, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p23 

    This article reports that Missouri Senator Chris Koster became the first state legislator to switch parties. A likely candidate for attorney general in 2008, Koster received a chilly reception from state attorney general candidates Jeff Harris and Margaret Donnelly. The winner of the Democratic...

  • BUS BATTLE. Niedowski, Erika // New Republic;08/03/98, Vol. 219 Issue 5, p16 

    Deals with the opposition of African Americans in Missouri to the candidacy of Democrat Jeremiah W. Nixon for the state's U.S. Senate seat. Stand of Nixon on the issue of busing that earned him the anger of African Americans; Efforts of African Americans to block the candidacy of Nixon; Actions...

  • Campaign Reform: Is There a Consensus? Abbe, Owen G.; Begelow, Nathan S.; Herrnson, Paul S. // Campaigns & Elections (1996);Jul2002, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p44 

    Presents the views of U.S. political candidates on proposed reforms for election campaign. Support for free media time or free postage; Opinion on soft money and public funding for campaigns; Information on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002.

  • The Senate Series: Missouri. Hucker, Charles // New Republic;10/30/76, Vol. 175 Issue 18, p19 

    Provides information on political campaigns of candidates for Senate from Missouri. Nomination of governor Warren E. Hearnes for the Senate by the Democratic Party; Brief description of the political career of Hearnes; Opposition of Hearnes by Republican candidate John C. Danforth; Effect of...

  • The New Federal Campaign Act -- In a Nutshell. Gross, Kenneth // Campaigns & Elections (1996);Jul2002, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p22 

    Discusses the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act which was signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush. Prohibition of soft money among the national party committees; Regulation on the solicitation and spending of election candidates; Submission and disclosure of electioneering communication.

  • Time out.  // Fairfield County Business Journal;6/11/2012, Vol. 48 Issue 24, p4 

    The author discusses the suggested suspension of Christopher Donovan of its campaign for Fifth District seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. He states that it is only appropriate that Donovan suspend his campaign because of the arrest of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of its campaign...

  • New Hampshire Post Mortem. K.L. // National Review;10/10/1975, Vol. 27 Issue 39, p1096 

    The article considers the influence of the new campaign law on the victory of Democrat John Durkin in a poll taken before the election in New Hampshire. The new law imposed a campaign ceiling of $220,000 on each candidate. The value of the services received by the candidate from organized labor...

  • State and Local Parties Must Tread Carefully Through the Campaign Finance Minefield. Sandler, Joseph E.; Reiff, Neil P. // Campaigns & Elections (1996);May2004, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p50 

    Discusses the impact of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act on the activities of state and local political parties in the U.S. in 2004. Fund raising; Payment for federal election activities; Coordination with congressional or presidential candidates.

  • Open the Campaign-Spending Floodgates. Cary, Mary Kate // U.S. News Digital Weekly;11/5/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 44, p12 

    The author comments on the effect of unlimited campaign spending on the U.S. midterm elections in November 2010. She points out that the court decision declaring campaign spending as legal is good for democracy. She adds that unlimited campaign spending has eliminated long-term incumbency and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics