Symptoms can predict the need for computed tomography in minor head injury

April 2003
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry;Apr2003, Vol. 74 Issue 4, p442
Academic Journal
Focuses on the use of symptoms to predict the need for computed tomography in minor head injury. Use of common odd ratios.


Related Articles

  • Need for Repeat CT Following Minimal Head Injury. Walling, Anne D. // American Family Physician;1/1/2005, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p175 

    Discusses a study which dealt with the need for repeat computed tomographic (CT) scanning following minimal head injury. Doubt about the value of repeat CT in patients with normal or improving neurologic examinations; Definition of minimal head injury; Negative predictive value of normal or...

  • Which emergency department patients with minor head injuries require computed tomography? Jin, Eddie; Bullard, Michael J. // CJEM: Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine;May2002, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p209 

    Examines whether highly sensitive and clinically sensible decision rule can be developed to guide the use of computed tomography scanning in adults with minor head injuries. Blunt trauma to the head resulting in definite amnesia; Reliability of radiographic interpretations; Need for...

  • Clinical validation of S100B use in management of mild head injury. Calcagnile, Olga; Und‚n, Linda; Und‚n, Johan // BMC Emergency Medicine;2012, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p13 

    Background: Despite validated guidelines, management of mild head injury (MHI) is still associated with excessive computed tomography (CT) scanning. Reports concerning serum levels of S100B have shown promise concerning safe reduction in CT scanning but clinical validation and actual impact on...

  • The Canadian CT Head Rule reduced the need for CT scans more than the New Orleans Criteria in minor head injury. Smits, M.; Dippel, D. W.; de Haan, G. G. // Evidence Based Medicine;Apr2006, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p61 

    The article focuses on the results of a study on the selection of patients who should receive computed tomography scanning. The Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) and the New Orleans Criteria has been compared. The New Orleans Criteria had higher sensitivity than the CCHR for identifying patients with...

  • Commentary. Edmonds, Marcia // Evidence Based Medicine;Apr2006, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p61 

    The article presents comments on a study on the selection of patients who should receive computed tomography scanning. Combined with clinical judgment, Canadian CT Head Rule seems to be the best option to guide CT scan use in patients with minor head injury. There is a need for implementation...

  • AKT answer relating to head injury.  // InnovAiT;Oct2011, Vol. 4 Issue 10, p603 

    A quiz concerning the use of computerized tomography (CT) for head injuries is presented.

  • Can we abolish skull x rays for head injury? Reed, M. J.; Browning, J. G.; Wilkinson, A. G.; Beattie, T. // Archives of Disease in Childhood;Aug2005, Vol. 90 Issue 8, p859 

    Objectives: To assess the effect of a change in skull x ray policy on the rate of admission, use of computed tomography (CT), radiation dose per head injury, and detection of intracranial injuries; and to compare the characteristics of patients with normal and abnormal head CT. Design:...

  • An unusual mechanism for brain abscess formation in a child. Yu-Ching Chang; Jiun-Chang Lee; Kuang-Lin Lin; Chieh-Tsai Wu; Wong, Alex Mun-Ching // Child's Nervous System;Aug2009, Vol. 25 Issue 8, p1035 

    Intracranial infection is an uncommon but serious complication of head injury. This study describes a boy with a traumatic head injury caused by his mother’s teeth stemming from a traffic accident, without initial alteration of consciousness or focal neurological signs, who subsequently...

  • Clinical Study Helps Validate Skull X-Ray Guidelines.  // Clinical Pediatrics;Jan1988, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p13 

    The article reports that a study published by an U.S. Food and Drug Administration panel has helped validate the guidelines for skull X-rays after head trauma. The panel's recommendations were based on three generally accepted premises. Patients with skull fractures may or may not have...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics