TITLE

Many monkey experiments 'not justified'

AUTHOR(S)
Vines, Gail
PUB. DATE
November 1991
SOURCE
New Scientist;11/23/91, Vol. 132 Issue 1796, p15
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Details a report by the antivivisectionist group, Advocates for Animals, that one in five experiments on primates have no justification and should not have been allowed under British legislation. Scientific papers cited by the group describing research funded by the Medical Research Council or medical charities criticizing the experiments; Provisions of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act in 1986 supported by the group.
ACCESSION #
10557622

 

Related Articles

  • Is Animal Research Really Necessary? Spun, Brandon // Insight on the News;6/24/2002, Vol. 18 Issue 23, p21 

    Argues that experiments on animals often lead to erroneous conclusions with potentially harmful results, according to animal rights activists. Criticisms about animal research; Percentage of animal-tested drugs that had harmful side effects in humans between 1976 and 1985; Information on...

  • TESTS ON TRIAL. Callanan, Charlie // Nursing Standard;1/28/2009, Vol. 23 Issue 21, p19 

    A former nurse campaigns against the use of animals in medical research, arguing it is scientifically flawed. A group that defends vivisection argues live animal testing only takes place when no alternatives exist.

  • The Road Less Traveled: Emotions and Morality in Public Controversies: A Response to Brian Lowe. Groves, Julian McAllister // Qualitative Sociology;Mar2002, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p125 

    The article presents a response of the author to researcher Brian Lowe's comment on his book "Hearts and Minds: The Controversy Over Laboratory Animals." Lowe's excellent insights on the book explores the strengths of using a "moral vocabularies" approach to study moral conflicts, such as the...

  • Of guinea pigs and men.  // Nature Methods;Oct2005, Vol. 2 Issue 10, p721 

    Criticizes the terroristic activities of animal rights advocates with the goal of preventing animal experimentation. Decision of a family-run farm in Great Britain to stop raising guinea pigs for use in research; Intimidation of the family by animal rights extremists that included threats,...

  • PHS Revises Its Lab Animal Welfare Policy. Wortman, Judith // BioScience;Jul/Aug85, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p408 

    Reports on revisions to the Public Health Service's Policy on Humane Care and use of Laboratory Animals by Awardee Institutions. Assurance of compliance; Animal Research Committee; NIH's 'Guide for the care and Use of Animals.'

  • Physiology, Propaganda, and Pound Animals: Medical Research and Animal Welfare in Mid-Twentieth Century America. Parascandola, John // Journal of the History of Medicine & Allied Sciences;Jul2007, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p277 

    In I952, the University of Michigan physiologist Robert Gesell shocked his colleagues at the business meeting of the American Physiological Society by reading a prepared statement in which he claimed that some of the animal experimentation being carried out by scientists was inhumane. He...

  • French government takes on animal rights activists. Dorozynski, Alexander // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/21/92, Vol. 305 Issue 6864, p1246 

    Details the efforts of the French government to discourage animal rights activists. Encouragement of using cell and tissue cultures as alternative to animal experimentation; Performance of laboratory raids by activists; Emergence of trends on the choice of experimental animals.

  • Clear Fish and Frogs Hatch.  // Current Science;4/16/2010, Vol. 95 Issue 15, p14 

    The article reports on the move of Japanese scientists in Tsu, Japan to breed transparent frogs and fish to be used on their experiments to avoid killing them and starting a rift between them and animal rights activists who opposes dissecting animals in the region.

  • PETA radicals would totally ban all medical research using animals. Paris, Susan // Human Events;2/9/96, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p15 

    Comments on the animal rights community's commitment to nothing less than a complete ban on the use of animals for any research procedure. Implications for the scientific and medical community; Efforts of animal rights groups to raise funds for their campaign using people's love of their pets;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics