Silly academics

November 1991
New Scientist;11/9/91, Vol. 132 Issue 1794, p19
Details the statement made by Peter Lilley, British Secretary of State, that academics must share the blame for Great Britain's poor record in exploiting ideas commercially. Remarks of Donald Crawford of Product Register that the problem was a gap in communication and culture between academics and industry.


Related Articles

  • German lessons half-learnt.  // New Scientist;11/21/92, Vol. 136 Issue 1848, p3 

    Criticizes Peter Lilley of Britain's Department of Trade and Industry on the introduction of Faraday Centres that have been set up to transfer the most successful elements of Germany's Fraunhofer Institutes to Britain. Lilley has captured little of the recipe for success of these centers; What...

  • Untitled. Roth, Andrew // New Statesman & Society;10/15/93, Vol. 6 Issue 274, p26 

    Reports on Peter Lilley's political life. National Audit Office's discovery of errors in his department's income support awards; Fighting to retain his massive 70 billion pound Social Security budget; Key role as a leading anti-federalist; Lying over the banned exports to Iraq.

  • Lilley gets tough on benefit fraud.  // Public Finance;10/18/96, p3 

    Focuses on the powers granted to Great Britain social security secretary Peter Lilley under a package of anti-fraud measures announced in October 1997. Methods for detecting benefit frauds; Other measures by the government to track down benefits frauds.

  • Lilley warns of means- test advice trap. Blackmore, Nicole // Money Marketing;10/7/2010, p1 

    The article reports on the concern of former Social Security Secretary Peter Lilley over the possibility that independent financial advisers (IFAs) could face complaints in the future in which their pension savings will make them ineligible for means-tested benefits in Great Britain.

  • New-look Link.  // New Scientist;5/11/81, Vol. 130 Issue 1768, p17 

    Comments on plans by the British government to make its Link scheme more flexible. Collaborative research between industry and academia; Changes announced last week by industry minister Peter Lilley; Eligibility for Link funds; Previous arrangement.

  • Pension off the plan. Plender, John // New Statesman;03/14/97, Vol. 126 Issue 4325, p24 

    Focuses on the proposal made by Social Security Secretary Peter Lilley regarding privatization of pensions in Great Britain. Shifting of a relief on contributions to a relief on pensions; Possibility that the proposal may kill the standard pay-related occupational pension scheme.

  • Lilley leaves asylum-seekers to starve. Mackenzie, Alastair // New Statesman & Society;2/2/96, Vol. 9 Issue 388, p7 

    Focuses on the proposal of Great Britain's Social Security Secretary Peter Lilley to remove benefits from asylum-seekers. No entitlement to benefits for people who apply for asylum after February 5, 1996; Opposition from the Social Security Advisory Committee to Lilley's proposal.

  • Disloyalty: The ladder to success? Baxter, Sarah // New Statesman & Society;10/15/93, Vol. 6 Issue 274, p25 

    Reports on John Prescott and Peter Lilley's speeches during the Labour and Tory party conferences. Prescott as the image of a Labour working man; Mood of Labour delegates as loyal but questioning; Lilley's strengthened position in the conference; Prescott's interest in the position of shadow...

  • Britain may give social security to private firms. MacLeod, Alexander // Christian Science Monitor;3/12/97, Vol. 89 Issue 73, p5 

    Reports on the proposal in Britain by Social Security Secretary Peter Lilley, to phase out pensions paid for by taxes and require all workers to provide their own private pensions. Information on the state pension introduced in 1948; Reference to a pension plan introduced in Chile in 1980;...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics