TITLE

The Lamp Bulb Stranglehold

AUTHOR(S)
Quinn, T.K.
PUB. DATE
February 1961
SOURCE
New Republic;2/27/61, Vol. 144 Issue 9, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Opposes the continued monopolistic practices in the electric incandescent lamp industry in the U.S. Impact of monopoly on competition; Profits earned by General Electric from lamp sales; Suggestion that a federal court decision on General Electric's violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act did not stop the company from continuing its electric lamp bulb monopoly; Other anti-trust cases instituted against the company.
ACCESSION #
10539709

 

Related Articles

  • The Lamp Bulb Stranglehold. Quinn, T.K. // New Republic;2/27/61, Vol. 144 Issue 9, p9 

    Opposes the continued monopolistic practices in the electric incandescent lamp industry in the U.S. Impact of monopoly on competition; Profits earned by General Electric from lamp sales; Suggestion that a federal court decision on General Electric's violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act did...

  • Comments on Switgard Feuerstein's “Collusion in Industrial Economics–A Survey”. Mehta, K. // Journal of Industry, Competition & Trade;Dec2005, Vol. 5 Issue 3/4, p217 

    These comments elaborate on the policy implications of theoretical models and compare them with competition law and practice. In regard to EU merger control it is discussed how case law has dealt with the creation of market structures that would maintain collusion. With respect to leniency...

  • THE FLAWED INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF U.S. MERGER REVIEW: STACKING THE DECK AGAINST ENFORCEMENT. Frankel, Lawrence M. // Utah Law Review;2008, Vol. 2008 Issue 1, p159 

    The article focuses on the issues regarding identifying competitive merger from uncompetitive merger and the analysis of the U.S. merger regulations. It states that making an institutional system should avoid false positives and convict mergers that lessen competition. According to the Section 7...

  • Antitrust Laws in a Global Market. Boarman, Patrick M. // Challenge (05775132);Jan/Feb93, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p30 

    This article focuses on the U.S. antitrust law in the global market. The framers of the landmark antitrust laws of the U.S.--the Sherman Act of 1890 and the Clayton Act of 1914--were not concerned with how these laws impacted the international competitiveness of U.S. business. Foreign trade in...

  • T. R. B. from Washington.  // New Republic;10/3/64, Vol. 151 Issue 14, p2 

    Focuses on economic developments in the U.S. Discussion about total net capital assets of all manufacturing corporations; Favor of checks and balances in the political structure of the country; View of economists that antitrust laws are pretty much out of date; Importance of the Public Utility...

  • Using Relative Profit Incentives to Prevent Collusion. Lundgren, Carl // Review of Industrial Organization;Aug1996, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p533 

    This paper describes a new economic method for preventing oligopoly collusion. The method eliminates incentives for collusion by making managerial compensation depend on relative profits rather than absolute profits. This alteration of managerial incentives sets up a zero-sum game among the...

  • Law Enforcement Bureau for Antimonopoly and Anti-Unjust Competition Established.  // China Chemical Reporter;8/16/2008, Vol. 19 Issue 23, p4 

    The article reports on the Law Enforcement Bureau for Antimonopoly and Anti-Unjust Competition established by China's State Administration for Industry and Commerce. The bureau takes charge of developing specific measures/methods for antimonopoly and anti-unjust competition. It is also...

  • STUDYING OF SPECIAL PRACTICAL ISSUES OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE. Hajiyev, Nazim U. // Journal of Economic Sciences: Theory & Practice;2012, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p55 

    Abuse of a dominant position, or monopolization, is one of the most challenging areas of competition law in both developed and emerging markets. Situations involving abuse of dominance may range from predatory behavior by firms in isolated local markets for low-technology products (for example,...

  • Firm Effects and Industry Effects in the Analysis of Market Structure and Profitability. Bass, Frank M.; Cattin, Philippe; Wittink, Dick R. // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);Feb1978, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p3 

    The Federal Trade Commission's recent public policy emphasis has been on antitrust action to break up firms in certain industries. The basis for such action is often the market structure-profitability paradigm. The authors review the framework and empirical results of studies based on the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics