TITLE

NEW DEATH PENALTY STATUTE IN IDAHO

AUTHOR(S)
Shaw, Stephen
PUB. DATE
May 2003
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2003, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p867
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the revisions made by the Idaho legislature to their death penalty statute in February 2003 in response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Ring versus Arizona case. Provisions of the revised death penalty law in Idaho on sentencing; Number of death-row inmates in the state; Reason behind the moratorium plans on death penalty in the state.
ACCESSION #
10528557

 

Related Articles

  • A 'COMMONSENSE' THEORY OF DETERRENCE AND THE 'IDEOLOGY' OF SCIENCE. Galliher, James M.; Galliher, John F. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall2001/Winter2002, Vol. 92 Issue 1/2, p307 

    Capital punishment is one of the most contentious public policy debates in the United States. While surviving since colonial times, the debate has become especially heated since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in "Furman v. Georgia" in 1972. In that decision, the Supreme Court outlawed...

  • EIGHTH AMENDMENT--CAPITAL SENTENCING INSTRUCTIONS. Brown, J. Michael // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter/Spring94, Vol. 84 Issue 4, p854 

    This article discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that the Texas capital sentencing statute did not violate the Eighth Amendment rights of petitioner Dorsie Lee Johnson, Jr. The Eighth Amendment requires the level of punishment for a crime to be directly proportional to a...

  • RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS: certiorari to the united states of appeals for the fourth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Ramdass v. Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, case number 99-7000, argued on April 18, 2000 and decided June 12, 2000. The case focuses on the capital punishment law in Virginia. Petitioner was sentenced to death...

  • THE ABOLITION OF THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN AFRICA: A COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS. Novak, Andrew // Indiana International & Comparative Law Review;8/1/2012, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p267 

    The article presents a comparative constitutional analysis of the abolition of the mandatory death penalty in Africa. It also highlights the invalidation of mandatory death penalty in certain court cases of the U.S. and India and these decisions provide legal basis for the introduction of...

  • Going It Alone. De La Vega, Connie // American Prospect;Jul2004, Vol. 15 Issue 7, pA22 

    Reports on the growing number of countries that have abolished the death penalty in contrast to the U.S. Effect of the failure of the U.S. to follow the trends toward abolition on its influence in the international arena; Pressure facing the U.S. for its violations of international treaties and...

  • EIGHTH AMENDMENT--TRIAL COURT MAY IMPOSE DEATH SENTENCE DESPITE JURY'S RECOMMENDATION OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT. Wellek, Jeffrey Alan // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1984, Vol. 75 Issue 3, p813 

    This article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Spaziano v. Florida, that Florida's death penalty statute is constitutional, even though the trial judge can disregard the jury's decision on the appropriateness of the death penalty. The Court's approval of Florida's capital...

  • PROTECTING THE INNOCENT: THE MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL REPORT. Hoffman, Joseph L. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter2005, Vol. 95 Issue 2, p561 

    This article discusses a report on capital punishment issued by the Massachusetts Governor's in May 2004. The Massachusetts report outlined ten bold recommendations for the creation of a new kind of death penalty designed to be as accurate, and as fair, as humanly possible. In this article, the...

  • FOREWORD--QUIESCENCE AND FERMENT: THE 1974 TERM IN THE SUPREME COURT. Allen, Francis A. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Dec1975, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p391 

    This article looks at the performance of the October Term 1974 of the U.S. Supreme Court. The October Term 1974, was not a vintage year for those who follow the work of the Supreme Court through its criminal cases. It is not easy to overcome a sense of anticlimax produced by the Court's...

  • CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Dec1976, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p437 

    In summary, a majority of the Court squarely upheld the constitutionality of capital punishment. There was no majority opinion, but with regard to the constitutionality of particular statutes one can look to the Stewart plurality as the narrowest position upholding death penalty statutes and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics