TITLE

STATE SUPREME COURTS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW OF REGULATION

AUTHOR(S)
Graves, Scott; Teske, Paul
PUB. DATE
May 2003
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2003, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p857
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Compares judicial review by state supreme courts to that of federal courts in the U.S. Justification underlying judicial review; Examples of judicial activism in state courts; Categories of the reverse regulation decisions of state courts; Factors influencing the rate of reversals in state and federal courts.
ACCESSION #
10528547

 

Related Articles

  • REVISITING MICHIGAN v. LONG AFTER TWENTY YEARS. Simon, Matthew G. // Albany Law Review;2003, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p969 

    Offers a look at the 1983 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Michigan versus Long case on the issue of federal law or state grounds. Variety of standards that the court has implemented to deal with problems arising under ambiguously grounded cases; Purpose of the Long case and the...

  • FLEXING JUDICIAL MUSCLE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN THE FEDERAL COURTS. Yung, Corey Rayburn // Northwestern University Law Review;Winter2011, Vol. 105 Issue 1, p1 

    The article discusses a study on judicial activism in the U.S., a multi-dimensional judicial activity wherein judges substitute their judgment in place of that of other significant actors. The typical measures of activism include the court's striking down of a federal legislation, state and...

  • Judicial activism and common sense: An American perspective. Moens, Gabriel A.; Mumford, Marcus R. // Australia & World Affairs;Spring98, Issue 38, p52 

    Discusses judicial activism in the United States. Definition of judicial activism and judicial constraint; Power of judicial review of the American Supreme Court; Comparison of the Australian and American Constitution; Judicial activism in Canada; Decision based on a judge's preferred...

  • Taking Congress down three pegs. Gest, Ted // U.S. News & World Report;07/07/97, Vol. 123 Issue 1, p33 

    Reports on three rulings by the US Supreme Court in June 1997 that overturn laws by the US Congress. The history of the court's overturning of federal laws; The Religious Freedom Restoration Act; The Communications Decency Act; The Brady Act.

  • Transcript: Social and Economic Rights and the Colombian Constitutional Court. Cepeda-Espinoza, Manuel José // Texas Law Review;Jun2011, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p1699 

    The author analyzes the social and economic rights (SER) rulings of the Constitutional Court of Colombia (CCC) from an institutional and political context. He cites the institutional difference of the Colombian situation in terms of judicial independence, jurisdiction and tutela. He explains why...

  • WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS, DEMOCRACY AND JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION: THE HOBGOBLIN OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM. Edelman, Martin // Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p585 

    Addresses the role of judicial interpretation in the establishment and definition of democracy in the U.S. Discussion on the justification of the value of democracy; Importance of separating judicial from political issues on the interpretation of democratic theory; Impact of democracy on...

  • LA ACTIVIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL DEL CONSEJO DE ESTADO COLOMBIANO. Marcela Escobar Martínez, Lina // Vniversitas;ene-jun2006, Issue 111, p65 

    This article is the second result of the research project titled "The Modulation of Judgments by the Colombian Council " that has been carried out by the "Studies group on public law" within the research line called "Constitutional justice and society" at Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. The...

  • Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America. Rodríguez-Garavito, César // Texas Law Review;Jun2011, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p1669 

    The article discusses the impact of judicial activism on socioeconomic rights (SER) in Latin America. Of particular interest is the decision handed down by the Colombian Constitutional Court (CCC) in 2004 declaring that humanitarian emergency caused by forced displacement constituted an...

  • One Vote Shy of Tyranny. Jeffrey, Terence P. // Human Events;07/07/2000, Vol. 56 Issue 25, p1 

    Criticizes the judicial activism embarked upon by the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court. Ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Stenberg versus Carhart which legalized partial-birth abortion; Verdict on the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Boy Scout of America versus Dale; Discussion on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics