TITLE

LEVERAGING FEDERALISM: THE REAL MEANING OF THE REHNQUIST COURT'S FEDERALISM JURISPRUDENCE FOR STATES

AUTHOR(S)
Pickerill, J. Mitchell
PUB. DATE
May 2003
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2003, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p823
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examined the meaning of the Rehnquist Court's federalism decisions for states. Target of the Court's federalism jurisprudence; Argument on the key thrust of the Court's federalism doctrine; Effect of the Court's jurisprudence on state and local governments; Limitations of existing theoretical explanations on the federalism decisions of the Court.
ACCESSION #
10528540

 

Related Articles

  • Public Opinion on Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States in 2003. Kincaid, John; Parkin, Andrew; Cole, Richard L.; Rodriguez, Alejandro // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Summer2003, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p145 

    This research reports on public opinion surveys on intergovernmental and federal issues conducted in Canada, Mexico, and the United States in. March and April 2003. In all three countries, respondents most often see their federal government as being the least effective, least efficient, and...

  • STATES' RIGHTS.  // America;3/25/1944, Vol. 70 Issue 25, p686 

    The author presents an analysis on the States' Rights theory of the Constitution in the United States. It examines the social impact of clashes over the respective powers of the States and Federal Government. It is argued that a proper adjustment of the respective authority and States and...

  • CONSTITUTION AS COUNTERMONUMENT: FEDERALISM, RECONSTRUCTION, AND THE PROBLEM OF COLLECTIVE MEMORY. Spaulding, Norman W. // Columbia Law Review;Dec2003, Vol. 103 Issue 8, p1992 

    In this Article, Professor Spaulding reorients criticism of the Rehnquist Court's federalism jurisprudence as it has emerged in decisions limiting congressional prerogatives under Article I and Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. He argues that the Rehnquist Court's recent revival of robust...

  • The Way We Were & Are.  // Governing;Oct2002, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p37 

    Presents tabular and graphical charts on the influence and importance of states and localities in the U.S. federal system between 1987 and 2002.

  • Some Fundamentals of the Economic Role of Government. Samuels, Warren J. // Journal of Economic Issues (Association for Evolutionary Economi;Jun89, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p427 

    The author in the article explores an answer to the problem concerning the economic role of government. The answer is subjective but it is intended to be nonnormative. The answer that has been proposed has four parts, firstly, government is deeply involved in the definition and in the creation...

  • 10 Years of the Basic Law: the Rise, Retreat and Resurgence of Judicial Power in Hong Kong. Po-Jen Yap // Common Law World Review;2007, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p166 

    Since the National People's Congress Standing Committee's (NPCSC) reversal of the Court of Final Appeal's abrasive decision of Ng Ka Ling, the court has become cognizant of the repercussions of its decisions and has now adopted a pragmatic view toward its adjudicatory role. Where decisions...

  • BOLLING ALONE. Primus, Richard A. // Columbia Law Review;May2004, Vol. 104 Issue 4, p975 

    Under the doctrine of reverse incorporation, generally identified with the Supreme Court's decision in Bolling v. Sharpe, equal protection binds the federal government even though the Equal Protection Clause by its terms is addressed only to states. Since Bolling, however, the courts have almost...

  • OF RIGHTS AND CHOICES. Graglia, Lino A. // National Review;2/17/1992, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p39 

    The article comments on the role of judges in the interpretation of the Constitution. A legal right as a legally protected interest; it is a jurisprudential concept. A problem of social choice is a problem because interests recognized as legitimate come into conflict. The meaning of...

  • L'argumentation sur la question nationale au Québec. Gauthier, Gilles // GLOBE: Revue internationale d'etudes quebecoises;2006, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p257 

    The objective of this article is to characterize the arguments for sovereignty and for federalism in Quebec. It analyzes the constituent parts of two opposed argumentative triads: a nationalist deductive reasoning, a responsibility argument, and a necessity argument in favor of sovereignty; and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics