TITLE

EDITOR'S FOREWORD

AUTHOR(S)
Bonventre, Vincent Martin
PUB. DATE
May 2003
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2003, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p575
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Introduces a series of articles which deals with state courts, constitutional law and constitutional adjudication.
ACCESSION #
10528481

 

Related Articles

  • RECKONING WITH DISSONANCE: THOUGHTS ON STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE. Friedman, Lawrence // New England Law Review;Winter2006, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p437 

    Explores state constitutional law in the U.S. and its relevance to constitutional discourse about individual rights. Effect of dissonances created by indeterminacy on constitutional law; Paths toward public order under the Constitution; Judgments of state courts on state constitutional...

  • STANDING IN GOOD STEAD: STATE COURTS, FEDERAL STANDING DOCTRINE, AND REVERSE-ERIE ANALYSIS. Katz, Paul J. // Northwestern University Law Review;Spring2005, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p1315 

    Discusses the impact of a diverse state standing requirements on the enforcement of federal substantive rights on a systematic level by U.S. state courts. Implication of the U.S. Constitution and history for the position of the state courts as partners with federal courts in adjucating federal...

  • Police chase raises serious questions. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;4/9/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 15, p18 

    The article reports that the justices are deciding whether to grant immunity to a sheriff's deputy whose maneuver to end a high-speed chase left the fleeing driver seriously injured. In 2005, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's finding that the deputy is not entitled to...

  • IMPERSONAL JURISDICTION. Erbsen, Allan // Emory Law Journal;2010, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p1 

    Constitutional law governing personal jurisdiction in state courts inspires fascination and consternation. Courts and commentators recognize the issue `s importance, but cannot agree on the purpose that limits on personal jurisdiction serve, which clauses in the Constitution (if any) supply...

  • State High Courts, State Constitutions, and Individual Rights Litigation Since 1980: A Judicial Survey. Collins, Ronald K. L.; Galie, Peter J.; Kincaid, John // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Summer86, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p141 

    In 1985, state courts of last resort issued more decisions than in any year since 1950 in which they extended rights protections to individuals beyond those recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court by basing rights protections solely or independently upon state constitutional grounds. A survey of...

  • CLARIFYING STATE ACTION IMMUNITY UNDER THE ANTITRUST LAWS: FTC V. PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. DlVELEY, ANGELA M. // St. Thomas Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p73 

    The article discusses issues related to federalism and national competition policy with the help of the U.S. States court of Appeals (11th circuit) decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System Inc. It informs that the State action doctrine seeks to solve the problem...

  • IS THE FOURTH CIRCUIT STARTING TO HOLD BACK?: EXAMINING POSSIBLE CHANGES IN HOW THE COURT APPROACHES SEARCHES, SEIZURES, AND SUPPRESSION. Shoemake, Derek A. // South Carolina Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p1085 

    An essay is presented on changing approach of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Fourth Circuit regarding searches, seizures, and suppression. It discusses several cases of Fourth Circuit in which it reversed district court's order denying a criminal defendant's motion to suppress evidence and held...

  • TOWARD THE DECENTRALIZATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND SELECTIVE DISINCORPORATION. Latzer, Barry // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall96, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p63 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's incorporation policy by which federal rights have been applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. The incorporation process was based upon an assumption that the states, including the state courts, were...

  • A PATH TO PURPOSIVE FORMALISM: INTERPRETING CHAPTER III FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY. WELSH, REBECCA // Monash University Law Review;2013, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p66 

    The article discusses concerns related to interpretation of the separation of federal judicial power and also investigates which method of interpreting Chapter III of the Constitution best achieves judicial independence and impartiality. It examines functionalist test to identify whether a power...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics