TITLE

Egos collide over abandoned particle detector

AUTHOR(S)
Charles, Dan
PUB. DATE
May 1991
SOURCE
New Scientist;5/18/91, Vol. 130 Issue 1769, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the collapse of international efforts to build a second detector for the Superconducting Supercollider (SSC) in Texas. Dispute between SSC officials and scientists who were supposed to build the detector; Design of detectors by Samuel Ting from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Solenoidal Detector Collaboration's winning of the contract to build the first detector; U.S. researchers' refusal to work in a collaboration headed by Ting.
ACCESSION #
10491091

 

Related Articles

  • AT LAST, CONGRESS AGREES TO BUILD SSC, AFTER TEXAS-TYPE WHEELING AND DEALING. Goodwin, Irwin // Physics Today;Oct89, Vol. 42 Issue 10, p51 

    Discusses the events that led up to the decision by a House-Senate conference committee in September to clear $225 million for the Superconducting Super Collider's (SSC's) first year. Comments by Congressmen involved in the dealmaking that eventually funded the SSC.

  • Performance of the Superconducting Super Collider H-rf volume ion source and Linac injector. Saadatmand, K.; Hebert, J. E.; Okay, N. C. // Review of Scientific Instruments;Apr94, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p1173 

    The Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) ion source is required to provide a 30 mA H[sup -] beam at 35 kev with a normalized rms emittance (∈[sub n-rms]) of less than 0.18 π mm mrad. An rf-driven volume source was chosen for the commissioning of the SSC linear accelerator (Linac). The...

  • DOE offers SSC site document, but sidesteps its endorsement.  // Physics Today;Sep85, Vol. 38 Issue 9, p53 

    Department of Energy offers Superconducting Super Collider site document, and sidesteps its endorsement. The behemoth scientific facility, the Superconducting Super Collider, to be built in the mid-1990s, is likely to be one of the Wonders of the World, and may improve our understanding of the...

  • America in Decline. Rigden, John; Stuewer, Roger // Physics in Perspective;Dec2011, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p385 

    The authors criticize the members of the U.S. Congress for the cancellation of the construction of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) and emphasize the implications of this decision on young physicists. They relate the effect of the cancellation of SSC on the flow of data about elementary...

  • Editorial. Rigden, John S.; Stuewer, Roger H. // Physics in Perspective;Sep2009, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p241 

    A commentary on the creation of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Superconducting Supercollider (SSC) is presented. The authors consider the impact of the introduction of the telescope and SSC on physicists. They believe the death of the SSC contradicted the resurrection of the Hubble. They...

  • AS RACE FOR SSC NEARS FINISH, DOE SEARCHES FOR CONTRACTORS. Goodwin, Irwin // Physics Today;Sep88, Vol. 41 Issue 9, p49 

    Discusses the competition for operators to run the Superconducting Super Collider project and consideration of seven of the best-run sites selected by the National Academy of Sciences.

  • SSC GETS BOOST FROM SENATE BUDGET VOTE. Vogt Jr., Carlton F. // Design News;8/21/89, Vol. 45 Issue 16, p16 

    Reports on the approval of the Superconducting Super Collider project with the help of the Senate budget vote in the U.S. Design and dimension of the collider; Technical details of the project; Expectation on the facility.

  • ALTERNATIVES TO THE SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER. Dyson, Freeman // Physics Today;Feb88, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p77 

    The article presents the author's views about the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC). He claims that although he is a supporter of particle physics, he opposes the construction of the SSC because it does not incorporate a new idea in physics. The author views this construction as a gamble and...

  • Enlarging the Zoo.  // Time;12/2/1974, Vol. 104 Issue 23, p84 

    The article reveals the discovery of a subatomic particle by Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist Samuel Ting and Stanford University physicist Burton Richter. It states that the particle tentatively called J particle was the heaviest atomic fragment ever found, almost 3 time more...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics