TITLE

Insurers fighting Illinois class action rulings

AUTHOR(S)
Brostoff, Steven
PUB. DATE
August 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;8/31/98, Vol. 102 Issue 35, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on insurance groups' call on the United States Supreme Court to review Illinois courts' decisions on a nationwide class action lawsuit against Bloomington, Illinois-based State Farm. Courts' ruling that all claims involving five million policyholders in 48 states can be litigated in Illinois under Illinois law alone; Implications of the rulings on state regulation of insurance and subject insurers.
ACCESSION #
1035260

 

Related Articles

  • Award called example of why reform needed. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;10/18/99, Vol. 33 Issue 42, p2 

    Examines the significance of a punitive damage award levied against the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. to the way interstate class action lawsuits are tried in the United States. Cause of the breach of contract lawsuit; Massive appeal for tort reform; Prevention of `forum-shopping'...

  • Double Whammy.  // Insurance Advocate;10/16/99, Vol. 110 Issue 41, p4 

    Reports on a class action award against insurance company State Farm by Illinois circuit judge, John Speroni. Reason Speroni increased the award; Damages to be received by policyholders; Statement issued by State Farm chairman and chief executive officer Edward Rust Jr. regarding the verdict.

  • Illinois Jury/Judge Hit on State Farm Reverberates Throughout the Country. Zinkewicz, Phil // Insurance Advocate;10/16/99, Vol. 110 Issue 41, p6 

    Reports on the verdict on a class action lawsuit filed by policy holders against insurance company State Farm. Damages to be paid by State Farm; Reaction of people involved in the issue; Issue in using aftermarket crash parts.

  • Lawsuit says nonfactory crash parts are inferior. Harris, Donna // Automotive News;4/6/1998, Vol. 71 Issue 5760, p24 

    Focuses on a class-action suit that questions the quality of nonfactory crash parts for vehicles. The Illinois Supreme court rejecting a petition by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. to block the lawsuit; The issues of State Farm requiring repair shops to use aftermarket parts in place...

  • Landmark Decisions. Molla, Tony // Automotive Body Repair News;Oct99, Vol. 38 Issue 10, p6 

    Comments on the class action lawsuit filed against State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. in Marion, Illinois. Issues of contention relevant to the insurance and collision repair industries; Attempts by State Farm to manipulate the evidence of the trial.

  • State farm appeals $1.2 billion verdict in parts lawsuit. Grady, Tina // Automotive Body Repair News;Feb2000, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p10 

    Focuses on the plans by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. to file an appeal to overturn its class action trial verdict. Punishment for the company on substituting the use of non-original equipment manufactured (OEM) car parts in its policies; Explanation of why the verdict will burden...

  • State Farm loses trial. Semler; Barone, Angi // Automotive Body Repair News;Nov99, Vol. 38 Issue 11, p1 

    Reports on the courts' ruling on the `Tammy Snider and Michael Avery vs. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.' class-action lawsuit. Breach of contract with policyholders; Violation of Illinois consumer fraud law; Compensatory damages; Punitive and compensatory damages. INSETS: Courtroom...

  • Supreme court won't hear Illinois car-parts lawsuit.  // Best's Review / Property-Casualty Insurance Edition;Dec98, Vol. 99 Issue 8, p20 

    Reports on the United States Supreme Court's refusal to hear arguments in a lawsuit against Bloomington, Illinois-based insurance company State Farm Insurance Group. Case background; Ruling's impact on the lawsuit's status as a class action.

  • Local impact unclear in State Farm lawsuit. Rettig, Ellen // Indianapolis Business Journal;10/19/98, Vol. 19 Issue 31, p18 

    Reports on a class action lawsuit against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. in Indiana. United States Supreme Court's rejection of the appeal of the company to break up the Illinois class action; Alleged violation of a standard provision in the company's insurance agreement.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics