TITLE

Recent Developments in California's Last Clear Chance Doctrine

AUTHOR(S)
Garon, Myron L.
PUB. DATE
September 1952
SOURCE
California Law Review;Fall52, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p404
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the Last Clear Chance doctrine for negligence cases in California. Definition of the doctrine; Comparison of the doctrine with Comparative Negligence; Limitations of the doctrine.
ACCESSION #
10329933

 

Related Articles

  • South African Maritime Law Update: 2005. Wagener, Michael // Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce;2006, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p403 

    The article discusses developments to the South African maritime law in 2005. An incident at Anangel Fidelity which reflects issues related to discharge of cargo, remoteness of damage and contributory negligence is described. Information is presented on a case about admiralty practice. The...

  • Bills To Modify South Dakota Contributory Negligence Defeated.  // Insurance Advocate;03/31/2001, Vol. 112 Issue 13, p14 

    Reports on the defeat of bills on modified contributory negligence by the South Dakota legislature. Effect of the action on consumers and insurers; Provisions of the bills.

  • Salt in the Wound: How Several Liability Aggravates the Harm to Innocent Plaintiffs. Bass, Brandon E. // Tennessee Bar Journal;Oct2007, Vol. 43 Issue 10, p19 

    The article focuses on the adoption of comparative fault by Tennessee to be applied in liability cases. The state Supreme Court claims that its adoption of comparative fault was due largely to considerations of fairness. Before adopting the said concept, the court based its decision on the...

  • It takes two to tango: Rethinking negligence liability for the sexual transmission of AIDS. Sundbeck, William // Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine;Summer95, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p397 

    Proposes that the courts recognize the defenses of contributory and comparative negligence in AIDS transmission cases. General overview of the nature of AIDS; Scope of the AIDS crisis; Case law involving the negligent transmission of venereal disease; Evaluation of attempts to analogize...

  • Comment. Cooper, Joseph D.; Lowenthal, Morris; Wahrhaftig, Felix S. // California Law Review;Mar1933, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p240 

    Comments on several legal issues in the U.S. Status of political parties and primary elections under fifteenth amendment; Corroboration of testimony of accomplice; Views on last clear chance doctrine as affected by plaintiff's obliviousness of danger and continuing negligence and the...

  • UNINSURED MOTORIST ARBITRATION--ACTION ON CONTRACT--SIX-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun1966, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p121 

    This article presents information on several court cases dealing with uninsured motorist arbitration. It is informed that insured who promptly files claim with Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. for injuries sustained as a result of accident with uninsured motorist has six years within...

  • Negligence.  // A-Z of Health & Safety;2006, p379 

    The chapter titled "Negligence" of the book "The A-Z of Health and Safety" is presented. It offers information on the legal procedure and consideration of industrial negligence in Great Britain. It discusses the three principal elements of a claim for negligence, and the defences that can be...

  • DID EQUINE LIABILITY ACTS SAVE THE HORSE INDUSTRY? Sweet, Jacqueline // Drake Journal of Agricultural Law;Summer2011, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p359 

    The article focuses on equine lawsuits and the creation of better equine liability laws that protect the horse industry in the U.S. Equine liability has been under tort law theories of contributory negligence and comparative negligence. The negligence theory protects the industry from lawsuits...

  • TORT LIABILITY IN SOUTH CAROLINA: DOES SECTION 15-38-15 TRULY LIMIT JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY OR IS IT A MERE ILLUSION IN THE REALM OF PHANTOM TORTFEASORS? Edmonds, Amity S. // Charleston Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p679 

    The article proposes the consideration of the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act by a court or jury in liability apportioning in South Carolina. It illustrates the issues surrounding the Act's language and demonstrates possible abuse. It tracks the shift in the state's tort law from...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics