VI targets compulsory

April 2003
Farmers Weekly;4/18/2003, Vol. 138 Issue 15, p71
Trade Publication
Discusses the threat of farmer apathy to the success of Voluntary Initiative (VI), which was designed to stop a pesticides tax. Benefits from the implementation of VI.


Related Articles

  • Good practice can avert a spray tax.  // Farmers Weekly;11/29/2002, Vol. 137 Issue 22, p5 

    Reports on the possible implementation of a pesticide tax in Great Britain. Effect of the proposal on agriculture; Actions that should be taken by farmers to prevent the proposed tax.

  • VI HAS MORE VALUE THAN A TAX.  // Farmers Weekly;8/22/2003, Vol. 139 Issue 8, pS14 

    Explains that farmers in U.K. should adopt the Voluntary Initiative to stave off pesticides tax. Cost of pesticides tax which farmers shall bear; Exclusion of pesticides tax in insurance; Strategy farmers can make to deal with VI and the threat of pesticides tax. INSET: Join NRoSO now urges...

  • Assurance schemes the way to fight pesticide tax threat? Riley, Jonathan // Farmers Weekly;6/13/2003, Vol. 138 Issue 23, p6 

    Deals with the role of farm assurance schemes in the farmers' fight against pesticide tax in Great Britain. Outlook of National Farmers Union cereals committee chairman, Peter Kendall on the issue; Status of the compliance of farmers to the Crop Protection Management Plans.

  • VI effort keeps pesticide tax at bay. Ashbridge, Ian; Riley, Jonathan // Farmers Weekly;3/4/2005, Vol. 142 Issue 9, p14 

    Reports on the efforts of the Voluntary Initiative (VI) to prevent the imposition of pesticide tax in Great Britain. Commendation of the Voluntary Initiative's role in improving sprayer testing to reduce pesticides in surface water; Importance of the VI to farmers.

  • Initiative is on track. Spackman, Paul; Abel, Charles // Farmers Weekly;10/8/2004, Vol. 141 Issue 15, p41 

    Reports on efforts to counter the pesticide tax through the Voluntary Initiative in Great Britain. Estimated number of farm operators have signed up for the National Register of Sprayer Operators (NRoSO) in Great Britain, as of October 2004; Action taken by NRoSO to encourage best practice this...

  • Take care with IPU--or lose it.  // Farmers Weekly;10/10/2003, Vol. 139 Issue 15, p5 

    Focuses on the difficulty of keeping residual herbicides such as isoproturon or IPU, out of water, which may be used for drinking. Reason that water companies would prefer farmers to avoid IPU; Significance of IPU to growers.

  • 'Go back to pre-strob triazole rates'. Abel, Charles // Farmers Weekly;1/9/2004, Vol. 140 Issue 2, p41 

    Reports on the advice for plant growers in England and Scotland to go back to pre-strobilurin triazole rates in spring 2004. Reason for the advisory; Comments from Bill Clark of the Agricultural Development and Advisory Service; Disadvantage of the use of higher rates of strobilurin.

  • 14 chems miss EU's July ban. Abel, Charles // Farmers Weekly;7/12/2002, Vol. 137 Issue 2, p45 

    Reports on the approval of the use of a variety of pesticides in Great Britain. Benefits to British farmers.

  • Untitled. Mill, Caverton // Farmers Weekly;5/30/2008, p6 

    The author reflects on the plans of the British government to withdraw some crop protection chemicals from the market. He narrates an accident during a crop spraying season when a combination of chemicals was sprayed directly into his face. The author observes that for once, the British...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics