TITLE

Minnesota court says no tearoom spying

PUB. DATE
July 1970
SOURCE
Advocate;7/8/70, Vol. 4 Issue 10, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the court judgment in Minnesota, Minneapolis, on the arrest of a man on charges of sodomy, from a department store restroom. Background of the case; Judgment passed in a similar case of gambling.
ACCESSION #
10285170

 

Related Articles

  • Nowhere Over the Rainbow. D'Entremont, Jim // Guide;Jan2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p10 

    The article presents news related to the Kansas Supreme Court's decision on an underage gay sex case. The discriminatory punishment for underage gay sex was declared unconstitutional by the Kansas Supreme Court. This ruling of Court gave accused Matthew Limon a measure of freedom after five...

  • Make the lawyers pay. Sheremata, Davis // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;03/03/97, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p29 

    Focuses on a 1997 trial in Canada in which Denise Kemp charged that she was subjected to unspeakable tortures by a Roman Catholic priest and nun 45 years earlier. Controversy over the judge's decision to award costs to the defendant after he had ruled against Kemp; Kemp's lawyer, Renee Cochard,...

  • Sexual abuse allegations against priests spark coverage dispute.  // Best's Review / Property-Casualty Insurance Edition;Apr95, Vol. 95 Issue 12, p51 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed against the Archdiocese of Milwaukee by 14 insurers for refusing to pay claims stemming from charges of sexual abuse by priests. Enumeration of the insurers including companies of the American International Group.

  • New for Women: WOMENSLINE: Lesbians to Sue.  // Advocate;1/26/77, Issue 208, p9 

    Focuses on the plan by lesbians for political action to sue the college of Redwoods for its involvement in homosexual activities in Columbia, California.

  • Sexual harassment claims stem from a hostile work environment. Koen Jr, C.M. // Personnel Journal;Aug90, Vol. 69 Issue 8, p88 

    Discusses recent court decisions that have made it clear that employers can be held liable for sexual harassment. Research; Title VII; EEOC; Case descriptions; Guidelines; SEC.

  • Harassment charges: Who wins? Bozzi, V. // Psychology Today;May89, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p16 

    Discusses how anyone contemplating the decision to file a sexual-harassment charge is probably wasting time unless they are sure they have a cut-and-dried case. According to a recent study, all but the strongest cases fail.

  • DaimlerChrysler vows to appeal decision in sex harassment trial. Ankeny, Robert // Crain's Detroit Business;05/08/2000, Vol. 16 Issue 19, p34 

    Reports the plans of DaimlerChrysler AG to appeal the ruling of Wayne County Circuit Court in a sexual harassment case in Michigan. Denial of DaimlerChrysler's motion for a new trial; Rejection of the company's request for a reversal of the jury verdict and reduction of the judgment amount;...

  • The Art of Trial Advocacy.  // Army Lawyer;Jun2002, Issue 353, p42 

    Provides suggestions to prepare a child abuse victim for trial. Child interview plan; Tips when conducting an interview with the child; Techniques to prepare a young child-witness for trial.

  • California district pays in harassment claim.  // Curriculum Review;Apr97, Vol. 36 Issue 8, p3 

    Reports that the Petaluma School District in California will pay $250,000 in settlement, for a lawsuit alleging its officials failed to halt sexual harassment of a female student by other students. Charges brought by girl in lawsuit.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics