TITLE

Disparities in the receipt of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: between-hospital and within-hospital analysis using 2009-2011 California inpatient data

AUTHOR(S)
Jungyoon Kim; ElRayes, Wael; Wilson, Fernando; Dejun Su; Oleynikov, Dmitry; Morien, Marsha; Li-Wu Chen
PUB. DATE
April 2015
SOURCE
BMJ Open;Apr2015, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
102613711

 

Related Articles

  • Use of robotic RN rising, despite unclear advantages. Schieszer, John // Urology Times;Jul2014, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p9 

    The article discusses the increased use of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RRN) in the U.S. Topics discussed include the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample report on 5.7 percent patients out of 124,462 patients choosing RRN for treating radical nephrectomy (RN), debate at the American...

  • Still standing at the station: The case for open RP. Nelson, Joel B.; Gonzalez, Christopher M. // Urology Times;Oct2012, Vol. 40 Issue 11, p64 

    The article discusses the distinctions between the use of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer over the standard approach, the open radical prostatectomy (ORP). It notes that one cannot claim RARP is equivalent to ORP in the...

  • Second PrizePelvic Neuroanatomy and Innovative Approaches to Minimize Nerve Damage and Maximize Cancer Control in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Juan I. Martinez-Salamanca; Rajan Ramanathan; Sandhya Rao; Anil Mandhani; Robert Leung; Wolfgang Horninger; Astushi Takenaka; Joaquin Carballido; Jiangling Tu; Darracott Vaughan; Ashutosh Tewari // Journal of Endourology;Jun2008, Vol. 22 Issue 6, p1137 

    Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is an option for surgical management of clinically localized prostate cancer. There have been theoretical concerns, however, regarding lack of anatomic data with specific relevance to robot-assisted prostatectomy, use of thermal or electrical energy during...

  • Reporting the Canadian robotic experience: The outcomes and how we report them. Pautler, Stephen E. // Canadian Urological Association Journal;sep/oct2013, Vol. 7 Issue 9/10, p333 

    The article reports on the data collected by authors related to outcomes of treating localized prostate cancer using robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in Canada. It mentions that 95.3 percent of potency recovery rate at 24 months has been reported...

  • Robotics Improve PCa Control. CHARNOW, JODY A. // Renal & Urology News;Apr2014, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p1 

    The article discusses the study at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) on a robot-assisted prostate surgery with improved early cancer control. The researchers have monitored and compared patients that underwent radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). The findings...

  • Minimally invasive, open RP complication rates similar. Overmyer, Mac // Urology Times;May2012, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p33 

    The article focuses on the findings of several studies indicating no advantage of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) compared to open radical prostatectomy when it come to complication rates. It states that based from the data of the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), MIRP...

  • Studies suggest exciting future for robotic RP. Wolf Jr., J. Stuart // Urology Times;Feb2010, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p5 

    In this article the author discusses the efficacy of using robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The author believes that robotics can allow a consistent and comfortable performance of surgeons during operations through modifications of surgical procedures that is not possible with...

  • New techniques, robotics benefit laparoscopic RP. Deorah, Sundeep // Urology Times;2/1/2005, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p1 

    Examines the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted anatomical prostatectomy also known as Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy (VIP). Comparison of efficacy between robot-assisted and conventional radical retro public prostatectomy; Evaluation of a single surgeon learning curve for laparoscopic...

  • Robotic vs. open RP: Who pays the cost? Albertsen, Peter C. // Urology Times;Sep2012, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p4 

    The author discusses the issue over the cost of robot-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy (RP) in Maryland.

  • Outpatient RP May Be Feasible.  // Renal & Urology News;Jan2010, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p19 

    The article reports that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures may be feasible in treatment of prostate cancer patients.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics