Use last-chance agreement so you and your employee can push reset button at work

May 2015
HR Specialist: Pennsylvania Employment Law;May2015, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p3
The] article discusses a case of a male employee from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania who sued his company alleging retaliation and disability discrimination.


Related Articles

  • Cover employee expenses--or prepare for court.  // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Mar2014, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p1 

    The article discusses the Court of Appeal of California, 2nd Appellate District case Vasquez v. Franklin Management which deals with the reimbursement of employees' expenses incurred while performing their jobs.

  • Take care with Interview invitations.  // People Management;Mar2015, p15 

    The article discusses a court case involving a former employee of a company who raised a race discrimination grievance against that business claiming that he was denied a promotion and then applied for another role at the same company afterwards and was unsuccessful in his interview.

  • Caste case will go ahead.  // People Management;Feb2015, p13 

    The article discusses the British court case of Tirkey v. Chandok in which a nanny of Adivasi Indian descent claimed that her employers had discriminated against her based on caste, the employers' attempt to have the case thrown out, and a judge's ruling that the Equality Act (EA) covers caste.

  • Special case: Disciplining exemplary employee.  // HR Weekly;9/24/2018, Vol. 6 Issue 38, p2 

    No abstract available.

  • Fighting fire with fire: Is it wise to countersue?  // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Jun2013, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p1 

    The article focuses on the reasons as to why counterclaims or countersuit strategy is not a smart move for employers battling with employee lawsuit.

  • Was it OK to fire woman who complained about employer at public meeting?  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;7/12/2013, Vol. 9 Issue 196, p4 

    The article discusses the court case Wood v. Bethlehem Area Vocational Technical School wherein the plaintiff sued the employer after she was terminated when she complained about work condition in a public meeting.

  • REDUNDANCY SCORE MUST BE CONSIDERED.  // Accountancy;Sep2012, Vol. 149 Issue 1429, p65 

    The article comments on the case Nicholls v. Rockwell Automation Ltd. which involved the redundancy of an employee in Great Britain.

  • Legal Briefs.  // HR Specialist: Compensation & Benefits;Jan2013, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p3 

    The article discusses the U.S. court cases Clark v. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and Thompson v. Carolina Cabinet that deals with employee benefits and labor laws.

  • Court: Unions entitled to info about nonunion employees.  // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Jul2013, Vol. 7 Issue 7, p3 

    The article discusses the California Supreme Court case County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Employee Relations Commission which deals with employee privacy.

  • Lab must pay $2.73 million to wrongly fired workers.  // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Jul2013, Vol. 7 Issue 7, p5 

    The article focuses on the report that five former staffs of the Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory who alleged unlawful termination, breach of contracts, and age discrimination, received about $2.73 million from the jury in San Francisco, California.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics