FBI Admits Experts Gave Flawed Testimony in Hundreds of Trials

Fowler, Tara
April 2015
People.com;4/21/2015, pN.PAG
Those cases include 32 that ended in death-row convictions


Related Articles

  • Report cites flaws in FBI bomb analysis. McKenna, James T. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;4/28/1997, Vol. 146 Issue 18, p44 

    Reports that US Department of Justice investigators have concluded that Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) expert Richard Hahn gave scientifically flawed testimony against a man accused of bombing an Avianca Airlines 727 and selectively omitted information that might have implicated another...

  • GMC hears case against paediatrician in Sally Clark trial. Dyer, Clare // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);6/25/2005, Vol. 330 Issue 7506, p1463 

    Offers a look at the progress of a hearing in Great Britain's General Medical Council (GMC) in which a pediatrician is accused of giving false testimony in a murder trial. Details of the case, in which Sally Clark was charged with the murder of her two sons, who each died at home of separate...

  • The Effectiveness of Opposing Expert Witnesses for Educating Jurors about Unreliable Expert Evidence. Levett, Lora M.; Kovera, Margaret Bull // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);Aug2008, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p363 

    We tested whether an opposing expert is an effective method of educating jurors about scientific validity by manipulating the methodological quality of defense expert testimony and the type of opposing prosecution expert testimony (none, standard, addresses the other expert's methodology) within...

  • Court affirms judges' right to reject `junk science.' Reichhardt, Tony // Nature;1/1/1998, Vol. 391 Issue 6662, p4 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court affirmed the right of trial judges to disallow scientific testimony they believe to be flawed. Details about December 15, 1997 decision and its original case; Response of legal experts; Courts' reliance on expert scientific testimony; Issues of...

  • The Eyewitness, the Expert Psychologist, and the Jury. Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Dexter, Hedy R. // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);Sep1989, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p311 

    The admissibility of expert psychological testimony on eyewitness matters is currently in debate. In this research we bring data to bear on some of the critical issues underlying the debate, specifically, jurors' understanding and use of expert testimony. Mock jurors viewed a realistic...

  • Another Startling Verdict for Forensic Science. Gabrielson, Ryan // Pro Publica;Apr2015, p1 

    The article discusses the findings of a study of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) forensic hair comparison unit, which showed that 26 of 28 examiners in the unit gave flawed testimony in more than 200 cases during the 1980s and 1990s. Topics covered include other DNA analysis...

  • ARE WE THERE YET?: GATEKEEPERS, DAUBERT, AND AN ANALYSIS OF STATE V. WHITE. Nash, Mark R. // South Carolina Law Review;Summer2010, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p897 

    The article discusses the role of court judges as gatekeepers in determining whether the testimony of expert witnesses is reliable. In State v. White, the South Carolina Supreme Court clarified a decision of the South Carolina Court of Appeals, which ruled that the question of reliability of a...

  • The admissibility of expert testimony about cognitive science research on eyewitness identification. Stein, Edward // Law, Probability & Risk;Dec2003, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p295 

    Eyewitness identifications are important to jurors, especially in criminal trials. Psychological research has shown, however, that eyewitness testimony is systematically fallible in ways that undermine the goals of the rules of evidence. This article assesses the arguments for and against...

  • THE FBI'S JUNK SCIENCE. Fischer, Mary A. // GQ: Gentlemen's Quarterly;Jan2001, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p112 

    Investigates questionable forensic work conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Oil industry executive Ralph Plotner's case against the FBI after he was wrongfully convicted following inaccurate testimonies by FBI agents; Instances of contaminated evidence,...

  • Court backs limits on 'expert' testimony. Brostoff, Steven // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;01/05/98, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p6 

    States that the United States Supreme Court has issued a ruling which allows trial court judges to refuse to admit into evidence expert scientific testimony which they regard as insufficient to support a conclusion. Comment from Ken Schloman, federal affairs counsel for Alliance of American...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics