Veganism is not a protected religious creed in California

Hatch, D. Diane
July 2003
Workforce (10928332);Jul2003, Vol. 82 Issue 7, p16
Discusses the lawsuit filed by Jerold Friedman, a strict vegetarian, against Kaiser Foundation Hospitals for religious creed discrimination and retaliation under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Reason of the California Court of Appeal for dismissing his claims; Definition of California's regulation; Impact on human resources management.


Related Articles

  • Case round-up by Eversheds 020 7919 4500. Wilson, Penny // Personnel Today;6/8/2004, p16 

    The article presents information on two court cases of employment. In the Rihal vs. Ealing London Borough Council, case, Rihal was a senior surveyor with the council. During his employment, he witnessed many organisational changes but, in terms of his own career development, failed to achieve...

  • LEGAL CHECKLIST.  // People Management;6/1/2006, Vol. 12 Issue 11, p21 

    The article provides an update on the ruling issued by the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) in Great Britain to several employment-related cases. In the Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital NHS Trust v. Dunsby case, the EAT ruled that absence totting-up systems did not have to disregard absence...

  • WHO GETS WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION?  // Labor Law Journal;Nov52, Vol. 3 Issue 11, p775 

    The article reports on the decisions of court concerning workmen's compensation in the U.S. as of November 1952. Recent court decisions reported in Workmen's Compensation Law Reports include the following: A truck driver left his truck and was drowned in an attempt to aid a man who had broken...

  • Employment tribunal considers its verdict. Massie, Graeme // Nursing Standard;2/4/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 21, p6 

    Reports on the case of Maria Cook, former regional director of Royal College of Nursing (RCN), who claim that she was a victim of constructive dismissal and racial discrimination. John Humpston, trh RCN's acting director's rejection of Cook's claim that she was the victim of racial discrimination.

  • Worker Wins ADEA Claim. Danaher, Maria Greco // HR Magazine;Oct2007, Vol. 52 Issue 10, p99 

    This article reports that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a jury verdict of more than $220,000 in favor of a 52-year-old employee who claimed that his termination was motivated by his age. The case is Kight v. Auto Zone Inc. Kight sued Auto Zone, alleging a violation of the Age...

  • Legal checklist. Aikin, Olga // People Management;12/24/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 25, p19 

    Summarizes court decisions on several employment cases in Great Britain. Boyle versus Equal Opportunities Commission; Foster versus Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service; Hill versus General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corp.

  • Age Discrimination: Involuntary Retirement Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Williams, Stuart A. // Labor Law Journal;Jul78, Vol. 29 Issue 7, p391 

    This article focuses on the involuntary retirement provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967 of the U.S. The ADEA prohibits employment discrimination against individuals who are at least forty years of age but less than seventy years of age. To fall within the ADEA's...

  • Legal checklist. Aikin, Olga // People Management;5/14/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 10, p23 

    Summarizes the developments in employment case law. Details on the sex discrimination claim in the Cast versus Croydon College case; Findings on the Wandsworth Borough Council versus D'Silva and Lawn case; Decision on the South West Trains Limited versus Wightman case.

  • WATCH THIS SPACE.  // Employers Law;May2003, p12 

    Presents news briefs related to employment law in Great Britain as of May 2003. Court opinion on the case Kiel versus Jaeger on on-call hours for doctors; Decision on case on part-time employees.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics