TITLE

CTW faces fraud suit

AUTHOR(S)
Moore, Miles
PUB. DATE
March 2015
SOURCE
Tire Business;3/16/2015, Vol. 32 Issue 25, p0003
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that tire importer China Tire Warehouse Inc. (CTW) has been charged with penalties following the lawsuit filed by U.S. Justice Department and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to Court of International Trade in San Dimas, California. It discusses the import by CTW of tire under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. (HTSUS). Also mentioned the fraudulent entries and gross negligence of the company for CBP.
ACCESSION #
101669951

 

Related Articles

  • Protecting and Collecting the Revenue: Pressing Issues United States Customs and Border Protection Faces in a Time of Economic Recovery. Sajdak, Jeffrey // Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law;4/1/2011, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p619 

    The article discusses the issues encountered by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) during an economic recovery. It notes the increase of CBP litigation referrals to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the affirmative collection actions filed against sureties and/or importers by DOJ in...

  • Custom Fraud Fines Increase In 9 Months. Casabona, Liza // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;8/11/2009, Vol. 198 Issue 30, p12 

    The article reports that the U.S. Customs & Border Protection levied 15.8 million dollars in fraud penalties for textile and apparel trade law violations in 2009. Fraud penalties are issued when imported goods violate U.S. trade laws, such as falsely claiming apparel or textile imports have...

  • The Interplay of Jurisdiction Between 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) and § 1581(i). Miller, Justin R. // Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law;Spring2013, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p439 

    The article discusses the jurisdiction of the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) related to 28 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 1581 provisions. It informs about the parameters of § 1581 jurisdiction under two provisions including 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) and § 1581(i). It...

  • WHY CAN'T CUSTOMS GET IT RIGHT? Ross, Susan Kohn // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);10/18/2010, Vol. 11 Issue 41, p19 

    The article discusses the court decision in the case U.S. v. Pressman-Gutman. According to the author, it is great that the U.S. Court of International Trade reprimanded the Customs and Border Protection. She cites that it is already bad enough that the operational staff of the Customs proceeded...

  • Dummies for exporting. Edmonson, R. G. // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);1/19/2009, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p23 

    The article reports that dummy Automated Export System (AES) documents are being filed by exporters with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. According to Kathy Beaubien of the Agriculture Transportation Coalition, exporters of agricultural products filed dummy documents and amend them as...

  • CRACKING THE CODE. Edmonson, R. G. // Journal of Commerce (1542-3867);3/8/2010, Vol. 11 Issue 10, p28 

    The article highlights the dispute between customs brokers and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at the U. S. Court of International Trade over the revocation of filing code. It states that the National Customs Brokers and Fowarders Association of Amercia (NCBFAA) and the Pacific Coast Council...

  • A Race to the Courthouse?: Jurisdiction over Customs Admissibility Decisions. Smithweiss, Erik // Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law;Spring2013, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p291 

    The article suggests that the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) jurisdiction should not be precluded automatically through seizure of goods to review underlying admissibility decisions of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection in appropriate cases. It discusses judicial review over agency...

  • Lessons to be learnt from BAE.  // Supply Management;2/18/2010, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p7 

    The article reports on the 287 million-pound worth of fine to be paid by BAE Systems Inc. after the investigation of the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Great Britain Serious Fraud Office. It notes that the company failed to keep accurate accounting records with regard to activities in...

  • BAE Systems To Pay Fines Under Settlements With U.S., U.K.  // Defense Daily International;2/12/2010, Vol. 12 Issue 6, p4 

    The article announces the settlement of BAE Systems PLC with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Great Britain Serious Fraud Office in relation to the legacy investigations. The company will pay 400 million dollars fine in the U.S. and 47 million dollars in Great Britain. Chairman Dick Olver...

  • BAE Systems To Pay $447 Million in Fines Under Settlements With U.S., U.K.  // Defense Daily;2/8/2010, Vol. 245 Issue 24, p2 

    The article informs that BAE Systems, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Serious Fraud office of Great Britain have announced settlements in connection with legacy investigations. BAE will pay the U.S. the 400 million dollar fine and make additional commitments as it has been found guilty in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics