TITLE

One Supreme Court

AUTHOR(S)
Goldberg, Arthur J.
PUB. DATE
February 1973
SOURCE
New Republic;2/10/73, Vol. 168 Issue 6, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on a recommendation by a study group of eminent legal scholars and lawyers appointed by the Chief Justice of the U.S. pertaining to a major change in the structure of the judicial system. Proposal for a national court of appeals made up of a rotating panel of seven federal appellate judges; Staggering burden imposed by the rising case load upon the justices; Implications on the judicial system.
ACCESSION #
10152003

 

Related Articles

  • REFORM OF THE JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS: GENDER AND THE BENCH OF THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA. Davis, Rachel; Williams, George // Melbourne University Law Review;2003, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p819 

    The judges of the High Court of Australia are appointed by the federal executive on the basis of 'merit' after an informal and secret consultation process. This system is anachronistic when compared with the judicial appointments procedures and ongoing reforms in other common law jurisdictions,...

  • Accelerated Procedure in the Russian Arbitrazh Courts: A Case Study of Unintended Consequences. Hendley, Kathryn // Problems of Post-Communism;Nov/Dec2005, Vol. 52 Issue 6, p21 

    The article analyses one of the reforms that was introduced as a partial solution to the nagging problem of enhancing efficiency in ever increasing number of cases in Russia. The reform approves an acceleration of the consideration of simple cases that present no real dispute. Instead of...

  • Fight against 'judicial activism' to continue despite election.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;11/16/2006, Issue 986, p26 

    The article reports on the efforts of judicial critics to keep fighting against a judiciary they say has lost touch with America. It discusses the Election Day setbacks suffered by efforts to curb judges' independence in the United States. According to the judicial critics, judges too often make...

  • CONSIDERING PRECEDENT IN LOUISIANA: BALANCING THE VALUE OF PREDICTABLE AND CERTAIN INTERPRETATION WITH THE TRADITION OF FLEXIBILITY AND ADAPTABILITY. Algero, Mary Garvey // Loyola Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p113 

    The article offers information on the analysis of the sources of law and the value of precedent in Louisiana. It mentions about the study of Louisiana's legislation, Louisiana courts' writings about the sources of law and a survey of Louisiana judges. Information on Louisiana judicial system,...

  • Lawyers in Paradise. Lemke, Tim // Insight on the News;8/12/2002, Vol. 18 Issue 29, p32 

    Discusses the Rule 20 in the Mississippi justice system which states that cases with similar circumstances can be pooled. Opinion and support of litigators and judges on the rule; Misuse and abuse of the rule; Efforts of the Mississippi Legislature to reform the system.

  • The Impact of Race in Shaping Judicial Districts, 1876-1907. Barr, Alwyn // Southwestern Historical Quarterly;Apr2005, Vol. 108 Issue 4, preceding p426 

    Focuses on the impact of race in shaping judicial districts in the U.S. from 1876 to 1907. Opposition to black voter participation; Race views on selection of state judges.

  • A Theory of Justiciability. Siegel, Jonathan R. // Texas Law Review;Nov2007, Vol. 86 Issue 1, p73 

    The article examines whether the standing doctrine and justiciability constraints really serve a significant function in the U.S. judicial system. It relates the lack of general agreement concerning the purpose of justiciability provisions. It questions the suggestions that courts and scholars...

  • THE AGGREGATE HARMONY METRIC AND A STATISTICAL AND VISUAL CONTEXTUALIZATION OF THE REHNQUIST COURT: 50 YEARS OF DATA. Hook, Peter A. // Constitutional Commentary;Spring2007, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p221 

    The article examines the aggregate harmony metric and a statistical and visual contextualization of the Rehnquist Court. The "Harvard Law Review" published an annual matrix of the inter-agreement amongst all of the justices for a particular term. These matrices include both raw numbers and...

  • Debate Between Judge Lee R. West and Judge Robert H. Henry. West, Lee R. // Denver University Law Review;2003, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p783 

    Discusses why trial judges are inherently superior to appellate judges. Qualities of trial judges; Basic trial judges' rules that appellate judges always fail to learn.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics