TITLE

Maryland Can Tax Two Delaware Shell Companies, Court Rules

AUTHOR(S)
Newman, Emily
PUB. DATE
June 2003
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;6/11/2003, Vol. 344 Issue 31654, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The Maryland Court of Appeals ruled in June 2003 that the profits of two Delaware, Ohio-based holding companies are taxable by Maryland under existing law. The decision could generate more than $33 million in revenue for the state. The decision effectively eliminates a popular corporate tax loophole that allowed Maryland firms to set up shell companies in Delaware, which does not require companies to pay tariffs on certain assets that Maryland taxes.
ACCESSION #
10104674

 

Related Articles

  • INCOME TAX.  // Accountancy;Sep70, Vol. 81 Issue 925, p668 

    The article presents a legal case dealing with income tax in Great Britain. The article discusses facts, issues and ruling in the case of "Johnstone v. Heath." The case involves tax liability of a property dealer for his sale of property offered to him by his employer and explains the reversal...

  • Tax avoidance scheme fails. Cooper, John A. // Accountancy;May82, Vol. 93 Issue 1065, p44 

    The article presents an appeal by the Crown against a judgment of the High Court in Great Britain which allowed a claim for group relief as a result of a complex tax avoidance scheme. The Crown's appeal was upheld by a majority decision. The appeal concerned the interpretation of section 29 of...

  • WHERE WILL THE LINE BE DRAWN? Sherry, Michael // Accountancy;Feb1988, Vol. 101 Issue 1134, p108 

    This article discusses the outcome of court cases in Great Britain which illustrates the distinction between tax avoidance that may turn out to be illegal and a legitimate attempt to minimise clients' liability. Many thought that decision in Ramsay meant that tax schemes which had no purpose...

  • Hansard thrown into confusion.  // Accountancy;Oct2003, Vol. 132 Issue 1322, p100 

    The article reports that the case of R versus Gill & Gill, heard on July 31, 2003, has forced the Special Compliance Office to consider carefully how it operates in cases of serious fraud where the Hansard extract is used. This is a procedure deriving from a parliamentary question and answer...

  • Áhrif meginreglna EES réttar um bann við mismunun og takmörkun á fjórfrelsinu á sviði skattaréttar. þorsteinsdóttir, Ingibjörg // Bifröst Journal of Social Science;2010, Vol. 4, p91 

    The main topic of this article is the impact of the principle of non discrimination and restriction, based on the fundamental freedoms of the EEA Treaty, on member states legislation on direct taxation. An important question is what circumstances can justify exceptions to this principle. Court...

  • Trading trusts and tax avoidance: case W23 revisited. Flannery, Patrick // Chartered Accountants Journal;Dec2006, Vol. 85 Issue 11, p53 

    The article discusses the case that confirms whether the use of a trading trust structure is a tax avoidance arrangement subject to the general anti-avoidance provisions of the Income Tax Act. In the employment arrangements of a bakery company, the trading trust in question was established in...

  • Testing times for the tax man. Ferrers, Tony // Chartered Accountants Journal;Feb2000, Vol. 79 Issue 1, p90 

    Focuses on integrity measures to combat tax avoidance in Australia. Community dimension to taxation; Acceptance of taxes as a field for entrepreneurial and cost-cutting techniques; Restriction of the alienation of personal services.

  • International tax roundup. Reid, Alan; Cretton, Colin // Accountancy;Jul81, Vol. 92 Issue 1055, p18 

    Reports on antiavoidance tax proposals in Australia as of July 1981.

  • A primer on tax evasion. Tanzi, Vito; Shome, Parthasarathi // IMF Staff Papers;Dec93, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p807 

    Presents survey findings on the sources of tax evasion and attempts of economists in providing a theoretical underpinning to them. Methodologies for estimating tax evasion; Measures to address tax evasion.

  • INCOME TAX. Bisgeier, Stephen J. // California Law Review;Apr67 part 2, Vol. 55 Issue 1, p343 

    Discusses a legal case concerning the income taxation of a corporation in the U.S. Tax avoidance motive; Provisions of the section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; Business purpose test.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics