The Limits of Probabilistic Causality in Law

Cofone, Ignacio N.
January 2015
Global Jurist;Jan2015, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p29
Academic Journal
There is still controversy regarding what criterion to use to evaluate causality. The law & economics literature proposes the use of probabilistic causality as a superior criterion, suggesting the elimination of binary causality criteria. This led to explanations that violate our intuitions, fail to explain judicial decision-making, and are considered unjust. This paper proposes that neither binary nor probabilistic causality can provide a satisfactory answer for all scenarios. Probabilistic causality works well for general causal claims (types of claims centrally involved in rulemaking) while binary criteria perform better for single causal claims (types of claims commonly addressed by courts).


Related Articles

  • The Governance of Foreign Investment at a Crossroad: Is an Overlapping Consensus the Way Forward? Perrone, Nicolás M. // Global Jurist;Jan2015, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1 

    This article makes the claim that the present efforts to reform the international investment regime (IIR) will not save this field from the existing criticisms. Given the plural values at issue, it is unlikely that states - let alone local populations - will ever reach a consensus on the...

  • Provisional Measures During Suspension of ICSID Proceedings. Coleman, Matthew; Innes, Thomas // ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal;Fall2015, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p713 

    The purpose of provisional measures in the context of arbitration pursuant to the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and National of Other States (ICSID Convention) is to preserve the theoretically existing rights of the requesting party in circumstances of...

  • Recovering "Protection and Security": The Treaty Standard's Obscure Origins, Forgotten Meaning, and Key Current Significance. Koster, George K. // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law;Oct2012, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p1095 

    Among the most persistent controversies in international investment law is the nature of the "protection and security" standard found in most investment treaties. Some tribunals contend that the standard requires nothing more than physical protection of covered investments, while others maintain...

  • PLANNING OF THE LEGAL ENTITY NATIONALITY IN THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW. Vasilyevna, Novikova Tatiana // Theory & Practice of Social Development;2013, Issue 3, p132 

    The article deals with current practices of the legal entity nationality planning in the international investment law. The author considers the most problem areas of the topic: "round-tripping" capital and investors' migration. In corroboration of the suggested theses the author cites cases of...

  • The Court and the Judicial Process. Rosenne, Shabtai // International Organization;Summer65, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p518 

    This article focuses on the Statute of the International Court of Justice, which forms an integral part of the United Nations. The Charter, contrary to the Covenant of the League of Nations, is not tied in with any peace settlement. Arbitration and judicial settlement are excluded from the Peace...

  • STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND ARBITRATION: MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE AND THE COMMONWEAL. Vadi, Valentina; Gruszczynski, Lukasz // Journal of International Economic Law;Sep2013, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p613 

    Investment treaty tribunals have increasingly touched upon delicate issues, including for example access to water, public health or cultural polices. What standard of review have they adopted vis-à-vis state regulation aimed to protect fundamental interests and values? Can ideas regarding the...

  • Causation in the Law of State Responsibility and the Problem of Overdetermination: In Search of Clarity. Plakokefalos, Ilias // European Journal of International Law;May2015, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p471 

    This article addresses the preliminary steps that must be taken in order to study the problems stemming from overdetermination in the law of state responsibility. Overdetermination, broadly defined, is the existence of multiple causes (multiple wrongdoers, external natural causes, contribution...

  • Member State Compliance with the Judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in its Inception Phase. Tan, Morse // International Journal of Legal Information;Winter2005, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p320 

    The article focuses on the member state compliance with the judgments of the International American Court of Human Rights. In the case of the International American Court of Human Rights (IACHR), the secondary consequences, in case of a non-compliance with the court's judgments, seem less overt,...

  • The Casualty of Investor Protection in Times of Economic Crisis. Clauseen, Kathleen // Yale Law Journal;May2009, Vol. 118 Issue 7, p1545 

    In this article the author discusses the issue concerning the failure of the Argentinean government to protect the assets of American financial services provider Continental Casualty Co. during the 2001 financial crisis. She states that international arbitral tribunal has accused the government...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics