TITLE

Morbid Obesity: A Significant Risk Factor for Failure of Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Infection

AUTHOR(S)
Watts, Chad D.; Wagner, Eric R.; Houdek, Matthew T.; Osmon, Douglas R.; Hanssen, Arlen D.; Lewallen, David G.; Mabry, Tad M.
PUB. DATE
September 2014
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;9/17/2014, Vol. 96 Issue 18, pe154-1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Obese patients have a higher risk of complications following primary total knee arthroplasty, including periprosthetic joint infection. However, there is a paucity of data concerning the efficacy of two-stage revision arthroplasty in obese patients. Methods: We performed a two-to-one matched cohort study to compare the outcomes of thirty-seven morbidly obese patients (those with a body mass index of *40 kg/m2) who underwent two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty with the outcomes of seventy-four non-obese patients (those with a body mass index of <30 kg/m2). Groups were matched by sex, age, and date of reimplantation. Outcomes included subsequent revision, reinfection, reoperation, and Knee Society pain and function scores. The minimum follow-up time was five years. Results: Morbidly obese patients had a significantly increased risk for revision surgery (32% compared with 11%; p < 0.01), reinfection (22% compared with 4%; p < 0.01), and reoperation (51% compared with 16%; p < 0.01). Implant survival rates were 80% for the morbidly obese group and 97% for the non-obese group at five years and 55% for the morbidly obese group and 82% for the non-obese group at ten years. Knee Society pain scores improved significantly following surgery in both groups; the mean scores (and standard deviation) were 50 ± 5 points for the morbidly obese group and 55 ± 2 points for the non-obese group (p = 0.06) preoperatively, 74 ± 5 points for the morbidly obese group and 89 ± 2 points for the non-obese group (p < 0.0001) at two years, 72 ± 6 points for the morbidly obese group and 88 ± 3 points for the non-obese group (p < 0.0001) at five years, and 56 ± 9 points for the morbidly obese group and 84 ± 3 points for the non-obese group (p = 0.01) at ten years. Conclusions: Morbid obesity significantly increased the risk of subsequent revision, reoperation, and reinfection following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection. In addition, these patients had worse pain relief and overall function at intermediate-term clinical follow-up. Although two-stage revision should remain a standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection in morbidly obese patients, increased failure rates and poorer outcomes should be anticipated.
ACCESSION #
100510090

 

Related Articles

  • Total Knee Replacement in Young, Active Patients: Long-Term Follow-up and Functional Outcome. Long, William J.; Bryce, Christopher D.; Hollenbeak, Christopher S.; Benner, Rodney W.; Scott, W. Norman // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;9/17/2014, Vol. 96 Issue 18, pe159-1 

    Concern exists regarding the long-term durability and effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in young patients. We reviewed our experience with total knee arthroplasty in patients fifty-five years old and younger with severe osteoarthritis to determine the long-term outcomes. One hundred and...

  • Preoperative Physical Functions' Influence on Gait and Hospitalization after Total Knee Arthroplasty. YUTARO SANADA; TAKAYUKI SHIIKI; TAKESHI MORIMOTO; SUGURU OHSAWA; MASAO YUKIOKA // Rigakuryoho Kagaku;2014, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p197 

    [Purpose] To determine the influence of preoperative physical functions on gait and hospitalization of patients after total knee arthroplasty. [Subjects] Thirty-one knees of twenty-eight patients with knee osteoarthritis (knee OA) who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). [Methods] We...

  • Patient-specific instrumentation improves tibial component rotation in TKA. Silva, Alcindo; Sampaio, Ricardo; Pinto, Elisabete // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Mar2014, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p636 

    Purpose: To compare the femoral and tibial components rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed either with conventional or with patient-specific instrumentation. Methods: Forty-five patients underwent primary TKA and were prospectively randomized into two groups: 22...

  • The effect of femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty: Genesis II prosthesis versus Vanguard prosthesis. Kong, Chae-Gwan; Park, Se-Wook; Yang, Hyo; In, Yong // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Apr2014, Vol. 134 Issue 4, p571 

    Introduction: The Genesis II knee system incorporates 3° of external rotation into the femoral component and the femoral component is implanted in neutral rotation to the femur. The purpose of this study was to compare patellar tracking of the Genesis II knee system with that of the Vanguard...

  • Intramedullary control of distal femoral resection results in precise coronal alignment in TKA. Pfitzner, Tilman; Roth, Philipp; Perka, Carsten; Matziolis, Georg // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Apr2014, Vol. 134 Issue 4, p459 

    Introduction: There is still a relevant rate of outliers in coronal alignment >3° when the conventional technique is used, potentially accompanied by a poorer long-term clinical outcome and a reduced longevity of the implant. Intraoperative implementation of preoperative planning and above...

  • CORR Insights: Causes, Risk Factors, and Trends in Failures After TKA in Korea Over the Past 5 Years: A Multicenter Study. Song, Sang // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Jan2014, Vol. 472 Issue 1, p327 

    The article discusses a multicenter study conducted to determine the causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Korea over the past five years. It mentions the major causes of TKA failure including infection, loosening, wear, instability, and stiffness....

  • Mobile and Fixed Bearings Showed Similar Results Five Years After Total Knee Replacement. Bozic, Kevin J. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;2/19/2014, Vol. 96 Issue 4, p333 

    The article discusses a study on complications and outcome after five years of total knee replacement in patients. It provides an overview of the orthopaedic surgery of Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT), a partial factorial trial assessing patellar resurfacing, metal-backed components, and mobile...

  • Patient kinesiophobia affects both recovery time and final outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Filardo, G.; Roffi, A.; Merli, G.; Marcacci, T.; Ceroni, F.; Raboni, D.; Bortolotti, B.; Pasqual, L.; Marcacci, M.; Ceroni, F Berti; De Pasqual, L // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Oct2016, Vol. 24 Issue 10, p3322 

    Purpose: To evaluate the effects of kinesiophobia on both phases immediately after surgery and the final results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods: This study evaluated prospectively 101 patients (mean age 66 ± 8.0 years, 70 women and 31 men),...

  • Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges. Massin, P.; Delory, T.; Lhotellier, L.; Pasquier, G.; Roche, O.; Cazenave, A.; Estellat, C.; Jenny, J.; Jenny, J Y // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Oct2016, Vol. 24 Issue 10, p3131 

    Purpose: Revision of infected total knee replacements (TKR) is usually delayed for a period in which the joint space is filled with an antibiotic-loaded acrylic spacer. In contrast, one-stage re-implantation supposes immediate re-implantation. Formal comparisons between the two...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics