TITLE

Occupy Pensacola Prevails in 11th Circuit Appeal

AUTHOR(S)
McKenzie, Alistair
PUB. DATE
June 2014
SOURCE
Guild Notes;Summer/Fall2014, Vol. 39 Issue 2/3, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on an opinion issued by the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on the court case Occupy Pensacola v. City of Pensacola.
ACCESSION #
100345341

 

Related Articles

  • Plaintiff Has No Claim to Interest on Retroactive Lump-Sum Payment of Disability Pension Benefit.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Jun2007, Vol. 41 Issue 6, p5 

    The article discusses the court case Green v. Holland et al, decided on March 13, 2007. The case focused on the claim of the plaintiff regarding the interest he should have received when his disability pension benefit was delayed. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that...

  • Plan Administrator May Enforce Subrogation Clause Against Third Party Holding Specifically Identifiable Funds.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Apr2008, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p3 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff, a plan administrator of a health and welfare plan, sought to enforce a subrogation clause against a third party defendant. The plaintiff wanted the defendant to reimburse the plan of medical benefits paid to her dependent who met a car...

  • Documents in Benefits Denial Do Not Have to Be Produced Until Final Decision Is Issued.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Jul2008, Vol. 42 Issue 7, p2 

    The article presents a case in which the plaintiff failed to prove to the court that she was disabled and thus disqualified for her application for disability benefits. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit stated that the medical reports, which are relied on by the defendant plan...

  • Plan Administrator Reasonably Applied Offset and Recoupment Provisions.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Dec2008, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p2 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendant company with regard to the reduction of benefits. It states that the complainants were employees of the defendant, the administrator of the plan. It notes that the defendant's decision to decrease...

  • Threat To Consent Decree Funding Doesn't Warrant Federal Jurisdiction.  // Land Use Law Report;2012, Vol. 40 Issue 12, p2 

    The article presents a court case filed by the City of Sandy Springs of Fulton County, Atlanta to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which prohibited the district court from enjoining the state proceedings aimed to determine water delivery agreements. As a result, the state...

  • 11th Circuit Affirms 15 Year Sentence for HIV+Man Who Had Sex With Minor. Leonard, Arthur S. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Mar2004, p49 

    Reports that the panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th circuit, has affirmed a prison term for Jose Blas, found guilty of using the Internet to entice teenage girls to meet him for sex. Investigation of the case; Facts of the case; Basis for the court's ruling.

  • Psych Triage: Nurse Ruled Not At Fault.  // Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession;Feb2007, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p3 

    The article reports about a case of a girl who shot herself after getting released from the hospital. The girl made a suicide attempt with a knife but her boyfriend stopped her. She was taken to an acute-care hospital where she denied any suicidal intention and a nurse assessed the urgency of...

  • Plaintiff Failed to Exhaust Administrative Remedies.  // Benefits Magazine;Jun2013, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p60 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirms a finding that the plaintiff's claim for long-term disability benefits under a welfare benefits plan is barred by his employer. In McCay v. Drummond Company Inc., the Elevent Circuit ruled...

  • DUE DILIGENCE: No Free Pass for Morgan Keegan on Auction Rate Securities. French, Kristen // Registered Rep Exclusive Insight;5/3/2012, p1 

    The article reports on the decision made by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Montgomery, Alabama overturning a ruling favoring Morgan Keegan brokers in an auction rate securities (ARS) case.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics