Zalabardo, José
September 2013
Teorema;2013, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p5
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • Transparency, Doxastic Norms, and the Aim of Belief. Steglich-Petersen, Asbjørn // Teorema;2013, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p59 

    Many philosophers have sought to account for doxastic and epistemic norms by supposing that belief 'aims at truth.' A central challenge for this approach is to articulate a version of the truth-aim that is at once weak enough to be compatible with the many truth-independent influences on belief...

  • Is There an 'Ought' in Belief? Toribio, Josefa // Teorema;2013, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p75 

    According to the so-called teleological view of belief, the idea that beliefs aim at truth is taken to mean literally that the subject, in believing that p, has a certain goal: the goal of accepting p only if p is true. In contrast, according to the so-called normative view, the claim that...

  • Truth: the Aim and Norm of Belief. Whiting, Daniel // Teorema;2013, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p121 

    Belief is subject to a norm according to which one may believe a proposition if and only if it is true. After explaining how this view relates to the view that belief aims only at the truth, I defend my formulation of the norm of truth against a number of objections. A recurring issue which...

  • Aiming at Truth: On The Role of Belief. Glüer, Kathrin; Wikforss, Åsa // Teorema;2013, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p137 

    We explore the possibility of characterizing belief wholly in terms of its firstorder functional role, its input (evidence) and output (further beliefs and actions), by addressing some common challenges to the view. One challenge concerns the fact that not all belief is evidence-sensitive. In...

  • A CASE FOR EPISTEMIC AGENCY. OLSON, Dustin // Logos & Episteme;2015, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p449 

    This paper attempts to answer two questions: What is epistemic agency? And what are the motivations for having this concept? In response to the first question, it is argued that epistemic agency is the agency one has over one's belief-forming practices, or doxastic dispositions, which can...

  • An Evangelical Moment? Mouw, Richard J. // America;5/5/2008, Vol. 198 Issue 15, p20 

    The article explains the need for Christians to examine themselves as key to fight against the rise of atheism. According to the author, evangelicals need to reflect on how people, whom Christians have identified as enemies of the faith, may actually be speaking some truth. The author also...

  • Semantic Normativity. Wikforss, Åsa Maria // Philosophical Studies;Jan2001, Vol. 102 Issue 2, p203 

    Examines different versions of the idea that meaning is normative in order to determine whether any of them can be defended. Semantic normativity; Connection between meaning and truth; Transition from truth to normativity.

  • Knowing full well: the normativity of beliefs as performances. Sosa, Ernest // Philosophical Studies;Jan2009, Vol. 142 Issue 1, p5 

    Belief is considered a kind of performance, which attains one level of success if it is true (or accurate), a second level if competent (or adroit), and a third if true because competent (or apt). Knowledge on one level (the animal level) is apt belief. The epistemic normativity constitutive of...

  • Epistemic constraints on practical normativity. Robertson, Simon // Synthese;Aug2011, Vol. 181, p81 

    What is the relation between what we ought to do, on the one hand, and our epistemic access to the ought-giving facts, on the other? In assessing this, it is common to distinguish 'objective' from 'subjective' oughts. Very roughly, on the objectivist conception what an agent ought to do is...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics